Yes. As the chairman of CC I would disagree that 3.0 is non-free. ;-)
On Jul 14, 2007, at 1:33 JST, Jimmy Wales wrote:
On Jul 13, 2007, at 1:18 AM, geni wrote:
We have no control over what Creative commons put up in their webspace. We currently regard the CC 3.0 series of licences as non free because of the way they handle moral rights. Obviously Creative commons dissagree.
It is more accurate to say that "some people regard CC 3.0 licenses as non free".
In my opinion, people think that only because they do not understand the moral rights issues.
Please don't use the royal we to refer to your own opinions. :)
--Jimbo
Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
-- My Blog - http://joi.ito.com/ My Photos - http://www.flickr.com/photos/joi/ Facebook Profile - http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=505656997 LinkedIn Profile - http://www.linkedin.com/profile?key=1391