On 7/14/07, Brianna Laugher brianna.laugher@gmail.com wrote:
No it's not. Commons doesn't approve every acceptable license in the world, only the ones that come across our desk. This one's controversial. Just because Commons hasn't accepted it yet doesn't mean we never will.
It's non free. I fails to see why there should be any change of position.
I think we should -- or else CC should release a 3.1 that the naysayers will find acceptable -- because it's going to cause increasing problems for Commons as the CC 3.0 licenses become more widely adopted.
Minor problem compared to how widely NC and ND licenses are adopted.