Just a thought: shouldn't this topic be dealt with on the talk page of the
article in question...?
Riggwelter
2013/1/18 Cacahuate <yocacahuate(a)gmail.com>
<nagaraj.hadpad(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> kashmir is half shown
We don't need a political map for our India article, we need a travel map
- it should include areas that one can currently access and are controlled
by India. The Kashmir dispute can be noted in the article, but the map
needs to be a travel map that serves the traveler, that's our primary goal
Cacahuate
On Jan 18, 2013, at 8:56 AM, Sandy Harris <sandyinchina(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:21 AM, nagaraj hadpad
<nagaraj.hadpad(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> kashmir is half shown
>
> There are multiple maps on commons. This one may be better:
>
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:India_in_its_region_%28disputed_hat…
However, it shows disputed territories hatched. Those appear to be the
areas
which India currently controls but that China or
Pakistan also claim. If
so, the
caption needs to make that clear.
Isn't there also at least one region in the West of Tibet which India
claims
but
China controls? should that be shown?
_______________________________________________
Wikivoyage-l mailing list
Wikivoyage-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikivoyage-l
_______________________________________________
Wikivoyage-l mailing list
Wikivoyage-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikivoyage-l
.svg){kind=link}