Hi, I have been updating project portals [1] (e.g. www.wiktionary.org [2]) to the new coding infrastructure to avoid storing them in pages in meta (m:Www.wikivoyage.org_template [3]) among other reasons including better search experience, consistent design, better look, etc. Now every project has been migrated except wikivoyage because its portal is completely different (the picture of sunset). I have been wondering if this is okay to change it to the standard portal design (like wikipedia.org [4]) because: * This is not accessible, the contrast of the text is too low (because of the background image) for people with visual impairments. * The design is not following the Wikimedia standard (https://design.wikimedia.org/style-guide) for example the blue is not #36c * The general look doesn't follow the standard all other projects follow, that's part of the movement's brand. * The current design doesn't really take into account that we might have more wikivoyage languages in the future, doesn't have proper space for them (unlike the standard design) * The current design is completely broken on mobile. I mentioned this in meta [5] but didn't get any response. So I thought I bring it up here. Fixing this would take care of a lot of legacy infrastructure we have. Thanks! Best -- Amir (he/him) Links: ------ [1] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T273179 [2] https://www.wiktionary.org [3] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Www.wikivoyage.org_template [4] https://wikipedia.org [5] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Www.wikivoyage.org_template _______________________________________________ Wikivoyage-l mailing list -- wikivoyage-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikivoyage-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org