On 3.2.2012, at 3.58, Leigh Blackall wrote:
Well, no surprises that i find a problem out the very
outset, the opening paragraph of the ibtroduction that is imo a drastically limited
definition of open education, essentially seeing it as content ("materials")
ptoduction.
Leigh, you are right, like most of the time. On the other hand the title of the document
"Guidelines for Open Educational Resources (OER) in Higher Education" is clearly
stating that the document is about "resources".
I personally do not find the whole OER discussion very interesting anymore at all. There
are plenty of OERs online, but they are used very little. How they are used and how they
could / should be used is an interesting question.
Best regards,
- Teemu
----------------------------------------------
Teemu Leinonen
http://www.uiah.fi/~tleinone/
+358 50 351 6796
Media Lab
http://mlab.uiah.fi
Aalto University
School of Art and Design
----------------------------------------------