https://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/30073 It would be interesting to see whether there's something we can learn about Wikiversity and Wikibooks functioning and promotion, and about OER promotion by Wikimedia chapters in general.
Nemo
Did someone read the 14 (chapter1 + 2 in pdf) pages already + has some feedback in regards to WV/WB?
btw: WikiEducator "wikified" the text (1)
Erkan YILMAZ
(1) http://wikieducator.org/Guidelines_for_Open_Educational_Resources_for_Higher...
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemowiki@gmail.comwrote:
https://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/30073 It would be interesting to see whether there's something we can learn about Wikiversity and Wikibooks functioning and promotion, and about OER promotion by Wikimedia chapters in general.
Nemo
Education mailing list Education@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
Well, no surprises that i find a problem out the very outset, the opening paragraph of the ibtroduction that is imo a drastically limited definition of open education, essentially seeing it as content ("materials") ptoduction. To fail in picking this up in an introduction, tells me that anything broader that might be found in the guidelines, such as open access to assessment processes, is most likely window dressing. These guidelines are written by ppl with a technocentric, and content centric view of learning and ultimately education.
Ill read more, and expand on or review my reception so far of these guidelines. On Feb 3, 2012 8:48 AM, "Erkan Yilmaz" erkan77@gmail.com wrote:
Did someone read the 14 (chapter1 + 2 in pdf) pages already + has some feedback in regards to WV/WB?
btw: WikiEducator "wikified" the text (1)
Erkan YILMAZ
(1) http://wikieducator.org/Guidelines_for_Open_Educational_Resources_for_Higher...
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemowiki@gmail.comwrote:
https://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/30073 It would be interesting to see whether there's something we can learn about Wikiversity and Wikibooks functioning and promotion, and about OER promotion by Wikimedia chapters in general.
Nemo
Education mailing list Education@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
-- Find me at:
LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/yilmazerkan XING https://www.xing.com/profile/Erkan_Yilmaz2
personal blog http://IaskQuestions.com http://www.systemswiki.org Systems Thinking World Group: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=2639211&trk=anet_ug_hm
gnu/linux user #500092
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
Diese eMail enthaelt vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschuetzte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese eMail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet.
Wikiversity-l mailing list Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l
Hi all Open Education and E-Learning should cover a good variety of higher educational fields. Up to now it covers just the theoretical fields rather than more practical and technological. I assume introducing and conducting a reasearch based on a platform for teaching practical studio based Courses. Regarding the Research Project I am going to describe it a little bit here and with an example try to emphasize the needs and its important in Learning/Teaching process for Practical Studio Based Courses (PSBC). You know that Architecture is regarded as Form and Function. Regardless of this poor subtracts, which I believe rather than the form and function, Technology and Culture must be added in order architecture to be defined perfectly. Beside this attitude, misusing of computer by architecture students has caused an tremendous effect on the graduate quality. In this field, previously, the students in a studio had the opportunity of sharing their learning and experience with each other. Now a days, because of many changes of educational situation and facilities, the opportunity is non existent. This opportunity which is very important in this field and also in many other fields especially in fields with studio courses. Interactive Studio Courses (ISC) is a tool with a difference which will provide the opportunity in a well established tools and technology. It is a Portal Platform for universities which aims to help professors and students by providing a stimulating and extensive range of educational materials, ideas and assignments that can enrich learning and teaching across the Practical Studio Based Courses (PSBC). For professors, it offers the opportunity to enhance the planning curriculum of course details. For students, it provides a rich source of information and activities for individual study, class and group work as well as many ideas for PSBC. Wikiversity is a good base for this idea. Good luck Homer
2012/2/2 Leigh Blackall leighblackall@gmail.com
Well, no surprises that i find a problem out the very outset, the opening paragraph of the ibtroduction that is imo a drastically limited definition of open education, essentially seeing it as content ("materials") ptoduction. To fail in picking this up in an introduction, tells me that anything broader that might be found in the guidelines, such as open access to assessment processes, is most likely window dressing. These guidelines are written by ppl with a technocentric, and content centric view of learning and ultimately education.
Ill read more, and expand on or review my reception so far of these guidelines. On Feb 3, 2012 8:48 AM, "Erkan Yilmaz" erkan77@gmail.com wrote:
Did someone read the 14 (chapter1 + 2 in pdf) pages already + has some feedback in regards to WV/WB?
btw: WikiEducator "wikified" the text (1)
Erkan YILMAZ
(1) http://wikieducator.org/Guidelines_for_Open_Educational_Resources_for_Higher...
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemowiki@gmail.comwrote:
https://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/30073 It would be interesting to see whether there's something we can learn about Wikiversity and Wikibooks functioning and promotion, and about OER promotion by Wikimedia chapters in general.
Nemo
Education mailing list Education@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
-- Find me at:
LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/yilmazerkan XING https://www.xing.com/profile/Erkan_Yilmaz2
personal blog http://IaskQuestions.com http://www.systemswiki.org Systems Thinking World Group: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=2639211&trk=anet_ug_hm
gnu/linux user #500092
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
Diese eMail enthaelt vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschuetzte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese eMail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet.
Wikiversity-l mailing list Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l
Wikiversity-l mailing list Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l
On 3.2.2012, at 3.58, Leigh Blackall wrote:
Well, no surprises that i find a problem out the very outset, the opening paragraph of the ibtroduction that is imo a drastically limited definition of open education, essentially seeing it as content ("materials") ptoduction.
Leigh, you are right, like most of the time. On the other hand the title of the document "Guidelines for Open Educational Resources (OER) in Higher Education" is clearly stating that the document is about "resources".
I personally do not find the whole OER discussion very interesting anymore at all. There are plenty of OERs online, but they are used very little. How they are used and how they could / should be used is an interesting question.
Best regards,
- Teemu
---------------------------------------------- Teemu Leinonen http://www.uiah.fi/~tleinone/ +358 50 351 6796 Media Lab http://mlab.uiah.fi Aalto University School of Art and Design ----------------------------------------------
wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org