The new tool to track edit comments with hashtags seems like something useful to keep track of contributions. I have recently begun using #BNA and #JSTOR to mark some of my edits and it seems useful. It might be worth discussing and deciding standards for better tracking of usage of Wikipedia Library access grants and their usage.
https://tools.wmflabs.org/hashtags/search/BNA?lang=en
best wishes Shyamal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shyamal http://muscicapa.blogspot.com
Neat idea Shyamal. We are looking at a few ways to track when partner sources are added. The |via parameter, link search, and hashtags are all an option. We want to ideally limit the amount of extra thinking/remembering/doing editors have to do. I love your initiative here and think it's worth leaving as a suggestion for editors on the TWL talk page, or perhaps in our next newsletter.
Jake
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 8:16 PM Shyamal Lakshminarayanan lshyamal@gmail.com wrote:
The new tool to track edit comments with hashtags seems like something useful to keep track of contributions. I have recently begun using #BNA and #JSTOR to mark some of my edits and it seems useful. It might be worth discussing and deciding standards for better tracking of usage of Wikipedia Library access grants and their usage.
https://tools.wmflabs.org/hashtags/search/BNA?lang=en
best wishes Shyamal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shyamal http://muscicapa.blogspot.com
Wikipedia-Library mailing list Wikipedia-Library@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-library
It might be worth piloting this with one of the more active partnerships as well. Both BNA and Newspapers.com lend themselves particularly well to hashtags, because there are lots of smaller edits, to a wider range of pages. If you wanted to coordinate a 2-3 month trial with editors that have access to a particular project, asking all of them to try using the hashtags, and then collect feedback on if they found themselves using the hashtags and/or how successful they were at using them: that would be great!
As you know from the blog post: http://blog.wikimedia.org/2016/03/23/hashtags-expanding-outreach-wikipedia/ , the hashtags tool is still highly experimental -- so understanding to what extent experienced editors find this useful/intuitive would be great!
Cheers,
Alex Stinson
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Jake Orlowitz jorlowitz@gmail.com wrote:
Neat idea Shyamal. We are looking at a few ways to track when partner sources are added. The |via parameter, link search, and hashtags are all an option. We want to ideally limit the amount of extra thinking/remembering/doing editors have to do. I love your initiative here and think it's worth leaving as a suggestion for editors on the TWL talk page, or perhaps in our next newsletter.
Jake
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 8:16 PM Shyamal Lakshminarayanan < lshyamal@gmail.com> wrote:
The new tool to track edit comments with hashtags seems like something useful to keep track of contributions. I have recently begun using #BNA and #JSTOR to mark some of my edits and it seems useful. It might be worth discussing and deciding standards for better tracking of usage of Wikipedia Library access grants and their usage.
https://tools.wmflabs.org/hashtags/search/BNA?lang=en
best wishes Shyamal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shyamal http://muscicapa.blogspot.com
Wikipedia-Library mailing list Wikipedia-Library@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-library
Wikipedia-Library mailing list Wikipedia-Library@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-library
I have been using hashtags. It is tricky to remember. Other editors are not remembering as much as I am. I am using #artandfeminism and #nueva
I am remembering about 60% of the time.
A hashtag dropdown in the edit window would be handy. Typing out #artandfeminism is a tongue twister.
DO ALL CAPS work?
There was no reply-to-all on the message from Jake. Cheers! Wayne
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Shyamal Lakshminarayanan < lshyamal@gmail.com> wrote:
The new tool to track edit comments with hashtags seems like something useful to keep track of contributions. I have recently begun using #BNA and #JSTOR to mark some of my edits and it seems useful. It might be worth discussing and deciding standards for better tracking of usage of Wikipedia Library access grants and their usage.
https://tools.wmflabs.org/hashtags/search/BNA?lang=en
best wishes Shyamal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shyamal http://muscicapa.blogspot.com
Wikipedia-Library mailing list Wikipedia-Library@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-library
Wayne: thats our impression too, at the moment digital campaigns using hashtags seem to be somewhere between 60-80% usage (we only have a few examples at the moment), whereas in person events seem to be closer to 90--100% and are an excellent way to get new editors used to edit summaries.
The first step towards better usage, I think, is the ability to add one as part of a campaign to your editing session. You might want to weigh in on design features for a more permenant version of hashtags at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T123529 . I think they have the opportunity to close some of the adoption gap.
Cheers,
Alex Stinson
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:12 PM, J. j.blackmale@gmail.com wrote:
I have been using hashtags. It is tricky to remember. Other editors are not remembering as much as I am. I am using #artandfeminism and #nueva
I am remembering about 60% of the time.
A hashtag dropdown in the edit window would be handy. Typing out #artandfeminism is a tongue twister.
DO ALL CAPS work?
There was no reply-to-all on the message from Jake. Cheers! Wayne
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Shyamal Lakshminarayanan < lshyamal@gmail.com> wrote:
The new tool to track edit comments with hashtags seems like something useful to keep track of contributions. I have recently begun using #BNA and #JSTOR to mark some of my edits and it seems useful. It might be worth discussing and deciding standards for better tracking of usage of Wikipedia Library access grants and their usage.
https://tools.wmflabs.org/hashtags/search/BNA?lang=en
best wishes Shyamal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shyamal http://muscicapa.blogspot.com
Wikipedia-Library mailing list Wikipedia-Library@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-library
Wikipedia-Library mailing list Wikipedia-Library@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-library
Here in the Netherlands we are doing some experiments with hashtags as well. I agree that usage on live events might be better than for online activities, although that might partly result from the fact that people simply don't know that it exists. I have had some discussions with organizers of online activities about the usefulness of the tool - one thing that came out of it is that adding a hashtag might be useful for the respective Wikimedia chapter, but it's usually not useful for the editor him/herself.
The one thing that's also very clear from our experiments is that the communication about the hashtag needs to be very good, not only during the campaign but especially in the preparation phase. This might go so far as that the hashtag is included in the banners that are put up - "Join the online writing week about Topic X - #Topic X".
Arne Wossink
Projectleider / Project Lead Wikimedia Nederland
*(Werkdagen: maandag, dinsdag, donderdag / Office hours: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday)*
Tel. +31 (0)6 11000505 E-mail: wossink@wikimedia.nl
*Postadres*: * Bezoekadres:* Postbus 167 Mariaplaats 3 3500 AD Utrecht Utrecht
2016-04-18 20:41 GMT+02:00 Alex Stinson astinson@wikimedia.org:
Wayne: thats our impression too, at the moment digital campaigns using hashtags seem to be somewhere between 60-80% usage (we only have a few examples at the moment), whereas in person events seem to be closer to 90--100% and are an excellent way to get new editors used to edit summaries.
The first step towards better usage, I think, is the ability to add one as part of a campaign to your editing session. You might want to weigh in on design features for a more permenant version of hashtags at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T123529 . I think they have the opportunity to close some of the adoption gap.
Cheers,
Alex Stinson
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:12 PM, J. j.blackmale@gmail.com wrote:
I have been using hashtags. It is tricky to remember. Other editors are not remembering as much as I am. I am using #artandfeminism and #nueva
I am remembering about 60% of the time.
A hashtag dropdown in the edit window would be handy. Typing out #artandfeminism is a tongue twister.
DO ALL CAPS work?
There was no reply-to-all on the message from Jake. Cheers! Wayne
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Shyamal Lakshminarayanan < lshyamal@gmail.com> wrote:
The new tool to track edit comments with hashtags seems like something useful to keep track of contributions. I have recently begun using #BNA and #JSTOR to mark some of my edits and it seems useful. It might be worth discussing and deciding standards for better tracking of usage of Wikipedia Library access grants and their usage.
https://tools.wmflabs.org/hashtags/search/BNA?lang=en
best wishes Shyamal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shyamal http://muscicapa.blogspot.com
Wikipedia-Library mailing list Wikipedia-Library@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-library
Wikipedia-Library mailing list Wikipedia-Library@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-library
Wikipedia-Library mailing list Wikipedia-Library@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-library
wikipedia-library@lists.wikimedia.org