Wayne: thats our impression too, at the moment digital campaigns using
hashtags seem to be somewhere between 60-80% usage (we only have a few
examples at the moment), whereas in person events seem to be closer to
90--100% and are an excellent way to get new editors used to edit
summaries.
The first step towards better usage, I think, is the ability to add one as
part of a campaign to your editing session. You might want to weigh in on
design features for a more permenant version of hashtags at
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T123529 . I think they have the
opportunity to close some of the adoption gap.
Cheers,
Alex Stinson
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:12 PM, J. <j.blackmale(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I have been using hashtags. It is tricky to remember.
Other editors are
not remembering as much as I am. I am using #artandfeminism and #nueva
I am remembering about 60% of the time.
A hashtag dropdown in the edit window would be handy. Typing out
#artandfeminism is a tongue twister.
DO ALL CAPS work?
There was no reply-to-all on the message from Jake. Cheers! Wayne
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Shyamal Lakshminarayanan <
lshyamal(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The new tool to track edit comments with hashtags
seems like something
useful to keep track of contributions. I have recently begun using #BNA and
#JSTOR to mark some of my edits and it seems useful. It might be worth
discussing and deciding standards for better tracking of usage of Wikipedia
Library access grants and their usage.
https://tools.wmflabs.org/hashtags/search/BNA?lang=en
best wishes
Shyamal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shyamal
http://muscicapa.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-Library mailing list
Wikipedia-Library(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-library
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-Library mailing list
Wikipedia-Library(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-library