The event Mahitgar mentioned was launch of Marathi Wikisource.
We had good interaction with Amol Palekarji about the issues mentioned by
Mahitgar.
The event report was sent to the community. However, all these points as
mentioned by Mahitgar was not reported as the main focus was Wikisource
launch.
This kind of issue will always happen when there is some wrong information
mentioned in the article.
Unfortunately, even if some editor corrects the information after
confirming with the concerned person(and mention accordingly in the talk
pages), that may still be rejected/objected asking for citation/reference.
Wikipedia editors may not accept the information coming from the person
itself !! :-)
btw,
There is no point in discussing about the journalists and the media
reporting. That is not in our control and its better to stick to Wikipedia
activities only.
Regards
-Sudhanwa
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Mahitgar from Marathi Wikipedia <
mahitgar(a)yahoo.co.in> wrote:
As far as Mahitgar's comment is concerned, I am not sure why any of us
should lose any sleep over the practices or standards of newspapers :-)
::Can some one ask this question to Amol
Palekar<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amol_Palekar#cite_note-1>ji ? This was a bit
funny but a true story remained un/under-reported
from Pune Wikimedian community. Amol Palekar was annoyed with non-factual
reporting by media and he wanted to show case it to them. A journalist of a
reknowned national daily called him up, Amol Palekarji gave knowingly gave
him incorrect information and those newspaper guys realy printed the news
story without cross-confirmation.Probably Amol Palekarji also forgot about
the instance. That news story got reffered on en wikipedia as it is. In
simmiller way Shruti Sadolikarji complained people started reffering Amol
Palekarji with wrong information , He enquired where the information is
coming from ? and was answered the info is coming from wikipedia. Without
reffering to all thsese rather than critcising wikipedia he praised
wikipedia in a fuction .Marathi News papers picked up that line and
reported.Pune marathi wikipedians happily aproached him with an invitation
for an inaugaral function .He accepted the invitation but made his
dipleasure known about incorrect info on wikipedia. We corrected some of
the facts on his insistance before the fuction.As you rightly said I left
one edit to be edited for furter confirmation from him during the meet.
Incidently the main audiance of wiki meet was all pune journalists and
journalism students and Journalism Dept HODs from University of Pune and
all.During the speech when he comlained about mis-information I corrected
info in a live demo at the same time brought to notice that info is coming
from a national credible daily news paper.And then he lectured the
audiance for their lapses and importance of cross confirmation of the
facts. That is not all ask media seniors themselves how good the situation
on the count we are discussing. What happens to India does it affect to
wikipedia ? specially to Indian wikipedians ? What percentage of resources
we reffer from online news papers and what percentage from the books ? For
Indic wikipedians who are working to build wikipedia with a cause, without
their fault a wrong information getting displayed on wikipedia , How
much a sincere wikipedian would love that? All the Indians do not get
opportunity to explain a journnalist importance of factual reporting after
due cross-confirmation. If a wikipedian explains them that this affects
credibility of the knowledge base a journalist may take it seriously , but
if we dont ? Our own hardwork suffers !
On Wednesday, 8 January 2014 12:49 PM, Vickram Crishna <
vvcrishna(a)radiophony.com> wrote:
The Tribune link (
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2000/20001107/cth2.htm|accessdate=5%20April%202…)
was wrong, it needs the extension deleted. I note that there is another
unreachable or unlisted reference - [7] - which needs updating.
On 8 Jan 2014 11:03, "Mahitgar from Marathi Wikipedia" <
mahitgar(a)yahoo.co.in> wrote:
The problem is with Indian Media and newspaper industry.Earlier times
Cheif editors and Subeditors used to insist and guide for crossconfirmation
of the information being collected and that is part and parcle of
journalists primary responsibility.
As far as Mahitgar's comment is concerned, I am not sure why any of us
should lose any sleep over the practices or standards of newspapers :-)
No doubt even wiki editors can make mistakes but atleast on wiki one can
make corrections.How one will make corrections in newspaper report ? If
journalist of a news paper has made a mistake,people need to ask the media
editors first.Wikipedia is just a seondary source of info.As much a
journalist has made a mistake , it is equally mistaken to blame internet
and wikipedia blindly.I suppose.
Why are we discussing this 'in the air'? It should just have been
corrected right away. If the opportunity (ie Internet access) was
available, it could have been corrected right in front of her. What better
way to demonstrate the participatory power of the world's best and most
accessible source of information to a sceptic? I think that this lady, or
some of her students, might have become Wikipedians themselves!
Once I read the original Tribune report, the reason for the error became
obvious. The original English is poor usage and could be misinterpreted,
which is clearly what happened in this case: [She belongs to the
well-known family of Kolhapur, which apart from its sugar mills, is also
famous for its sweet music.] actually means that Kolhapur is famous for
sugar mills and sweet music). Please let us assign blame where blame lies,
or else hold our peace (always the better option).
On Wednesday, 8 January 2014 6:06 AM, jayant kirtane <
j_kirtane(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
Yesterday I met Smt Shruti Sadolikar, musician, in the Music Department
of Mumbai University located in the rear of Churchgate station. In a
discussion with PhD students, a question was raised regarding the
reliability of citing internet references. Some of us gave examples about
how Wikipedia was used all over the world for all kinds of reasons. Smt
Sadolikar, who was present, gave an instance of wrong information in
Wikipedia:
"Sadolikar was born 1951 into a family from
Kolhapur<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolhapur> which
was known for its musical tradition and owning sugar
mills<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sugar_refinery>
.[3]
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shruti_Sadolikar#cite_note-Rough-3>[4]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shruti_Sadolikar#cite_note-TI-4>
" in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shruti_Sadolikar. She said that "a
hundred people" had mentioned the bit about owning sugar mills. This was
factually incorrect, and gave the wrong impression that she came from an
affluent family.
Now [4] is a newspaper article: Tandon, Aditi, "Three days of rich
musical treat", The Tribune, 6 November 2000. I looked up the source, and
sure enough, it mentions the sugar mills. So it seems that whoever wrote
the article merely repeated a factual error in the source (which has been
properly cited as [4] ).
Smt Sadolikar's father and guru was a musician, Marathi stage artist,
music director, etc. His Wikipedia entry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wamanrao_Sadolikar makes no mention of sugar
mills.
Smt Sadolikar had a point to make: if Wikipedia is to put information
about her in the public domain, is it not their responsibility to inform
her about it and confirm that the information is factual? Some of us had
said that Wikipedia was not organized along the principles of, say, a
newspaper, but if a factual error was brought to its notice, it would be
corrected. In that spirit I am sending this mail to your mailing list.
Like the rest of the world I am a grateful user and great fan of
Wikipedia.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-in-mum mailing list
Wikimedia-in-mum(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-mum
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-in-mum mailing list
Wikimedia-in-mum(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-mum
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-in-mum mailing list
Wikimedia-in-mum(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-mum
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-in-mum mailing list
Wikimedia-in-mum(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-mum