Another option is to create a Cascadia Wikimedians page at English Wikipedia. It might get more traffic and participation than the Meta pages. But, of course, this would just be one more page to manage. I would only recommend creating it if we think much of our activities will be centered around ENWP and if we think it would invite more participation. If we do want a page at ENWP (of course I am talking about a project page, not a Wikipedia article), I'd be happy to get one started.
Jason
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Benj. Mako Hill mako@atdot.cc wrote:
Greetings Pine!
<quote who="Pine W" date="Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 01:28:10AM -0800"> > However, if anyone has spare time to do things like set up websites > and bank accounts, please let me know.
I'm happy to set up a website. What sort of thing were you thinking?
It seems that lots of usergroups use their pages in meta as their main websites. Sometimes, groups have a prettier page on a domain that highlights some recent events and points there. I've hesitant to create a special website that we then need to maintain unless it's solving a problem. :)
Later, Mako
-- Benjamin Mako Hill http://mako.cc/
Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as society is free to use the results. --GNU Manifesto
Wikimedia-Cascadia mailing list Wikimedia-Cascadia@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-cascadia