James – I'm interested in reading [1] but the PDF is behind a login screen,
can I read this somewhere else (or do you have the full reference so I can
search it)?
Thanks,
Dario
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:43 PM, James Salsman <jsalsman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Can anyone familiar with European Commission procedure
please explain
how to support the Wikipedia-associated proposals in [1] based on the
statistics in [2] please? Very recent publications such as [3] in
Nature along with what appears to be a relatively sudden groundswell
of frankness and support e.g. [4] suggests to me that the time is
right to get out in front of these proposals.
[1]
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Nicholas5/
publication/275349828_Emerging_reputation_mechanisms_for_scholars/links/
553a22a60cf2c415bb06e6b7.pdf
[2]
http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~xshuai/papers/jcdl240-shuai.pdf
[3]
http://www.nature.com/news/fewer-numbers-better-science-1.20858
[4]
http://blog.scielo.org/en/2016/10/14/is-it-possible-to-
normalize-citation-metrics/
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
--
*Dario Taraborelli *Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation
wikimediafoundation.org •
nitens.org • @readermeter
<http://twitter.com/readermeter>