James – I'm interested in reading [1] but the PDF is behind a login screen, can I read this somewhere else (or do you have the full reference so I can search it)?

Thanks,
Dario

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:43 PM, James Salsman <jsalsman@gmail.com> wrote:
Can anyone familiar with European Commission procedure please explain
how to support the Wikipedia-associated proposals in [1] based on the
statistics in [2] please? Very recent publications such as [3] in
Nature along with what appears to be a relatively sudden groundswell
of frankness and support e.g. [4] suggests to me that the time is
right to get out in front of these proposals.

[1] https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Nicholas5/publication/275349828_Emerging_reputation_mechanisms_for_scholars/links/553a22a60cf2c415bb06e6b7.pdf

[2] http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~xshuai/papers/jcdl240-shuai.pdf

[3] http://www.nature.com/news/fewer-numbers-better-science-1.20858

[4] http://blog.scielo.org/en/2016/10/14/is-it-possible-to-normalize-citation-metrics/

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l



--

Dario Taraborelli  Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation
wikimediafoundation.org • nitens.org • @readermeter