Can anyone familiar with European Commission procedure please explain
how to support the Wikipedia-associated proposals in [1] based on the
statistics in [2] please? Very recent publications such as [3] in
Nature along with what appears to be a relatively sudden groundswell
of frankness and support e.g. [4] suggests to me that the time is
right to get out in front of these proposals.
[1] https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Nicholas5/ publication/275349828_ Emerging_reputation_ mechanisms_for_scholars/links/ 553a22a60cf2c415bb06e6b7.pdf
[2] http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~xshuai/papers/jcdl240-shuai.
[3] http://www.nature.com/news/fewer-numbers-better-science- 1.20858
[4] http://blog.scielo.org/en/2016/10/14/is-it-possible-to- normalize-citation-metrics/
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki- research-l
Dario Taraborelli Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation
wikimediafoundation.org • nitens.org • @readermeter