James – I'm interested in reading [1] but the PDF is behind a login screen, can I read this somewhere else (or do you have the full reference so I can search it)?
Thanks, Dario
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:43 PM, James Salsman jsalsman@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone familiar with European Commission procedure please explain how to support the Wikipedia-associated proposals in [1] based on the statistics in [2] please? Very recent publications such as [3] in Nature along with what appears to be a relatively sudden groundswell of frankness and support e.g. [4] suggests to me that the time is right to get out in front of these proposals.
[1] https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Nicholas5/ publication/275349828_Emerging_reputation_mechanisms_for_scholars/links/ 553a22a60cf2c415bb06e6b7.pdf
[2] http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~xshuai/papers/jcdl240-shuai.pdf
[3] http://www.nature.com/news/fewer-numbers-better-science-1.20858
[4] http://blog.scielo.org/en/2016/10/14/is-it-possible-to- normalize-citation-metrics/
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l