I am of the often non-unanimous opinions that the Foundation should, in
complete yet indirect accordance with its mission, take at least pro forma
and ideally active stances in favor of social issues such as free public
education through college, universal preventative health care, income
equality, gender wage equity, and greenhouse gas mitigation. Would anyone
object to a discussion of these questions?
Also, a more specific legal advocacy question: If Harald Bischoff has
defrauded Commons reusers by requiring stricter attribution than the
community requires, does the Foundation have standing in Germany to require
him to return the money to his victims in proportion to the extent that
their attribution was improper?