I am of the often non-unanimous opinions that the Foundation should, in complete yet indirect accordance with its mission, take at least pro forma and ideally active stances in favor of social issues such as free public education through college, universal preventative health care, income equality, gender wage equity, and greenhouse gas mitigation. Would anyone object to a discussion of these questions?

Also, a more specific legal advocacy question: If Harald Bischoff has defrauded Commons reusers by requiring stricter attribution than the community requires, does the Foundation have standing in Germany to require him to return the money to his victims in proportion to the extent that their attribution was improper?