On 23 October 2015 at 17:01, James Salsman <jsalsman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It annoys me to see what could be a powerhouse for
defending the community
from threats to the mission has apparently decided that a Twitter campaign
is the best they can do. I hope I am wrong, but where is the evidence that
more is being done?
You would like proof that the WMF publicpolicy/legal team is working on
defending the privacy of its users (readers and volunteers) by proactively
fighting the data-retention schemes of the US intelligence agencies? I
suggest their most recent quarterly review documents, specifically this:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Copy_of_WMF_Legal_Q1_2015…
Or are you saying that suing the NSA isn't sufficiently proactive in this
regard?