On 23 October 2015 at 17:01, James Salsman <jsalsman@gmail.com> wrote:

It annoys me to see what could be a powerhouse for defending the community from threats to the mission has apparently decided that a Twitter campaign is the best they can do. I hope I am wrong, but where is the evidence that more is being done?

You would like proof that the WMF publicpolicy/legal team is working on defending the privacy of its users (readers and volunteers) by proactively fighting the data-retention schemes of the US intelligence agencies? I suggest their most recent quarterly review documents, specifically this: https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Copy_of_WMF_Legal_Q1_2015-2016_Quarterly_review_slide_deck_(Public_Version).pdf&page=3

Or are you saying that suing the NSA isn't sufficiently proactive in this regard?