I like "action API".
Senior Technical Writer
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) <bjorsch(a)wikimedia.org
Summing up, it seems like "action API" and
"api.php" are the two
"api.php" is least likely to be confused with anything (only its own entry
point file). But as a name it's somewhat awkward.
"action API" might be confused with the Action class and its subclasses,
although that doesn't seem like a big deal.
As for the rest:
Just "API" is already causing confusion. Although it'll certainly continue
to be used in many contexts.
"MediaWiki API", "Web API", and "MediaWiki web API" are
liable to be
confused with the proposed REST API, which is also supposed to be
web-accessible and will theoretically part of MediaWiki (even though I'd
guess it's probably going to be implemented as an -oid). "MediaWiki web
APIs" may well grow to encompass the api.php action API, the REST API, and
maybe even stuff like Parsoid.
"MediaWiki API" and "Core API" are liable to be confused with the
hooks and PHP classes used by extensions.
"JSON API" wouldn't be accurate for well into the future, and would likely
be confused with other JSON-returning APIs such as Parsoid and maybe REST.
"Classic API" makes it sound like there's a full replacement.
All the code name suggestions would be making things less clear, not more.
If it had started out with a code name there would be historical inertia,
but using a code name now would just be silly.
Mediawiki-api mailing list