Feel free to ignore this suggestion but hasn't wiki loved libraries long
enough, and shouldn't this be more of a two way street? I suggest
#wikilib.
Merrilee
From: libraries-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:libraries-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Dominic
McDevitt-Parks
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 5:55 AM
To: Wikimedia & Libraries
Subject: Re: [libraries] Twitter?
On 6/19/12 10:36 PM, Bob Kosovsky wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Dominic McDevitt-Parks
<mcdevitd(a)gmail.com> wrote:
A WLL-related hashtag might be a good idea, though I think we should
talk about whether we don't just want people tweeting on the main
#glamwiki hashtag. In any case, though, I think #WLL is probably not
distinctive enough, and we might want at least #WLL2012
(#wikiloveslib?).
Which do you prefer: #WLL2012 or #WLL12? I like the second, only
because it's shorter and easier to type faster.
I kind of liked #wikiloveslib the most, for descriptiveness, but I
understand the need for brevity. I'm not the most avid Twitter user, in
any case, so what do I know? :-)
Dominic