On 6/19/12 10:36 PM, Bob Kosovsky wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Dominic
McDevitt-Parks
<mcdevitd(a)gmail.com <mailto:mcdevitd@gmail.com>> wrote:
A WLL-related hashtag might be a good idea, though I think we
should talk about whether we don't just want people tweeting on
the main #glamwiki hashtag. In any case, though, I think #WLL is
probably not distinctive enough, and we might want at least
#WLL2012 (#wikiloveslib?).
Which do you prefer: #WLL2012 or #WLL12? I like the second, only
because it's shorter and easier to type faster.
I kind of liked #wikiloveslib the most, for descriptiveness, but I
understand the need for brevity. I'm not the most avid Twitter user, in
any case, so what do I know? :-)
Dominic