This isn’t strictly a libraries question, but I’m sending to this group because I
appreciate the brain trust here. If there’s somewhere more appropriate to post this
question, please let me know.
A chemistry librarian I know sent this question:
“I am trying to help a professor who has written a biography of a fellow chemist whose
original work was in Russian, starting in the 50’s. My profs article has been rejected as
not being supported by reliable sources. The journals are reliable sources but they just
aren’t in English, apparently a major sticking point. Some may not be available
electronically either. Obviously we are looking at the articles and do have access to most
in translation and most electronic. Reality remains, as we all know, that some are just
not going to be translated nor available easily online. Is this the norm for Wikipedia?
One journal they considered non-reliable was Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR. Not exactly an
unknown, unreliable source. We can deal with this one but has left me wondering about the
rules, who decides what is reliable, etc. Would appreciate any insight and guidance I can
Anyone have insights? I would be grateful!