It was built with non-JS in mind. What you are referring to, however, is the flash of pre-JS styling. flow-menu should look fine in no-JS mode, because it's implemented with CSS only. Only older browsers require JS to make it work. However, I made some errors during the implementation, and exposed the more ugly version initially. This is something to be rectified.
--Shahyar
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Jon Robson jrobson@wikimedia.org wrote:
I would not object to restoring permalink but I worry the list might look rather empty without it. I'd rather we put effort into improving UX. I doubt that would be too much work, but it needs design input and prioritisation.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:25 PM, S Page spage@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Jon Robson jrobson@wikimedia.org
wrote:
I noticed in a code review today that S was confused to why actions are unavailable in titlebar and posts
(.client-nojs .flow-menu" has display:none in CSS)
...
Any functions that didn't fit into this, where the UX was suboptimal would be hidden, even if they were functional.
Thanks for the explanation. But e.g. the Permalink action is perfectly functional in no-JS. Are y'all going to revive that one action menu
item,
or wait for everything in the menu to get to the same quality level as
no-JS
reply before enabling it?
-- =S Page Features engineer
EE mailing list EE@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ee
EE mailing list EE@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ee