It was built with non-JS in mind. What you are referring to, however, is
the flash of pre-JS styling. flow-menu should look fine in no-JS mode,
because it's implemented with CSS only. Only older browsers require JS to
make it work. However, I made some errors during the implementation, and
exposed the more ugly version initially. This is something to be rectified.
--Shahyar
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Jon Robson <jrobson(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I would not object to restoring permalink but I worry
the list might
look rather empty without it. I'd rather we put effort into improving
UX. I doubt that would be too much work, but it needs design input and
prioritisation.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:25 PM, S Page <spage(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Jon Robson
<jrobson(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
I noticed in a code review today that S was confused to why actions
are unavailable in titlebar and posts
(.client-nojs .flow-menu" has display:none in CSS)
...
Any functions that didn't fit into this, where the UX was suboptimal
would be hidden, even if they were functional.
Thanks for the explanation. But e.g. the Permalink action is perfectly
functional in no-JS. Are y'all going to revive that one action menu
item,
or wait for everything in the menu to get to the
same quality level as
no-JS
reply before enabling it?
--
=S Page Features engineer
_______________________________________________
EE mailing list
EE(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ee
_______________________________________________
EE mailing list
EE(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ee