Cormac Lawler wrote:
Dear all, I'm just passing on an email which you
might find
interesting. It's from Ray Saintonge, who I think was the one who
coined the name "Wikiversity" (which he questions, below). The context
of the mail is that I asked him what he originally meant by a mailing
list post in 2005, in which he said:
snip
The preparation of elaborate courses will get us
nowhere in the absence
of sudents. The prospective student needs to relate the prospectus for
these courses to his own circumstances. What other incentive could he
possibly have for participating? Wikipedia has succeeded because it
began with an original idea that inspired people; that kind of
inspiration is absent from Wikiversity. Perhaps Newman should be
obligatory reading for anyone who seeks to teach a Wikiversity course.
Well he is undoubtedly correct that without participation the project
will go nowhere.
I find his statement that there is no original idea or vision behind
Wikiversity the project, rather than "Wikiversity" the grandiose term
first used in an email by me; rather patronizing and totally incorrect.
Perhaps he did not intend it for public consumption.
Roadrunner has grasped my original vision of the Wikiversity the project
quite admirably. He has proposed a learning portal for undergrad physics
student to help each other out damn near identical to what I had in
mind. Tutoring each other and leaving some crumbs behind for others.
There is some organizing principal involved when people reach similar
conclusions regarding how to proceed.
Perhaps you should invite Ray to come discuss Wikiversity, the project,
with some of us who think there is a vision and some goals for the
project to pursue.
regards,
mirwin