On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Elias Friedman <elipongo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The new policy is still too restrictive for commons:
"...we do insist that all images personally shot be used ONLY for personal
reference. They cannot be published for commercial use."
Regardless of their photography policy, the problem here is the vast
majority of their collection and exhibitions contain post-1923 works. Per
derivative works part of copyright law, you need permission from the artist.
(unlikely to happen!)
For pre-1923 works, we could (unadvised!) do like we did with the National
Portrait Gallery and just steal images off their website! Per derivative
works, photographing the item does not give them copyright.
-Katie (@aude)
Sent from my Droid2
Elias Friedman A.S., EMT-P
אליהו מתתיהו בן צבי
elipongo(a)gmail.com
On Dec 24, 2010 8:29 AM, "Liam Wyatt" <liamwyatt(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I just got sent this:
http://hyperallergic.com/15410/museum-of-arts-design-lifts-photo-ban/
Thought folks in NYC might like to know :-)
(although, I suppose that many things in there are still copyrighted
which
means that - with no USA freedom of panorama -
you still can't put them
on
Commons...)
Perhaps you already new this and it's old news, but good news
nevertheless!
Do you have, and if not, do you think it would be valuable to create, a
document listing the status of various cultural institutions in the NYC
area
according to their photographic and other
policies that have bearing on
free-culture? Perhaps that might be a good pilot project for the
free-culture alliance??
-Liam
wittylama.com/blog
Peace, love & metadata
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia_NYC mailing list
Wikimedia_NYC(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia_nyc