Of course not. Meta is the best place to do these things and I know that. ;-) My comment was about the thread he linked, the one that deals with clearing out the participants list.
On 9/4/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Casey Brown wrote:
I would strongly advise against this, it will probably just upset people. I think a better solution would be to just change it to "Interested Participants" and, if you want, send them all an e-mail via "E-mail user" notifying them of the mailing list (and asking them to subscribe), the IRC channel, and that you are trying to get the Chapter back on track and would like some assistance writing bylaws.
On 9/4/07, *Mitchell* <mduce@mts.net mailto:mduce@mts.net> wrote:
I'm interested in helping out! What does everybody think abouthttp://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:WMC#WMC_-_now_with_120_.22participants.2... ?
____________________ Mitch D. (Greeves on all English Wikimedia projects) -----Original Message----- From: wikimedia-ca-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:wikimedia-ca-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org> [mailto:wikimedia-ca-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:wikimedia-ca-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org>] On Behalf Of Delphine Ménard Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 3:37 PM To: Wikimedia Canada planning list Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-Canada] Spinning back up our WikimediaChapter
On 9/4/07, Gerald A <geraldablists@gmail.com <mailto:geraldablists@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Now that school has started and summer is starting to wind down, I'd like to > start to move the Chapter > creation process forward, and give it a solid schedule. \o/ > > I've made preliminary contact with a lawyer with the intention of getting > some assistance in drafting the various bylaws > that are required to give Wikimedia Canada a legal footing. I'm hoping > having someone with skill and knowledge will > shorten the time that it is taking us to tackle this task at present. > > My intention is to keep the process as open as possible, and make available > the by-laws on wiki (and possibly on the > mailing list), so everyone can review and comment on them before we submit > them for official consideration. On wiki is probably the best place. And yes, please a collaborative process, even if sometimes painful (been there, done that :-) ) is definitely the way to go. I would strongly advise meta.Casey, are you saying that you object to having this developed on Meta? I really don't understand why you think that having this on Meta would upset people?
Ec
Wikimedia-ca mailing list Wikimedia-ca@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-ca