This strikes me as the kind of change that can be great, even clarifying,
if the communities involved are on board -- and self-defeating if they are
not. This seems to be the latter, including a general lack of enthusiasm
among supporters of the change. So aside from questions of process,
stopping seems right. SJ
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 4:10 PM Joseph Reagle <joseph.2011(a)reagle.org>
wrote:
Thanks for this Phoebe!
I'm largely uninformed, but I liked the idea of replacing Wikimedia with
Wikipedia. That said, I see there's been some process concerns and this has
been a heck of a year, so I don't think there's a need to rush? Then again,
does delay bring anything other than not making the change?
Given that I'm mostly ignorant, and to whatever extent I'm a member of
Wikimedia New England, I'd "abstain" and trust it to the more clueful.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-boston mailing list
Wikimedia-boston(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-boston
--
Samuel Klein @metasj w:user:sj +1 617 529 4266