Hi Henning,
Just to put you at ease: I am not making such a proposal currently, but I
want to discuss options at Wikimania and other community events.
I must however correct you on "Educational content is per se suitable for
all ages". This is simply not true. Most educational is written with very
specific age groups in mind. A three year old will learn from a specific
category of books (most of them clearly marked with an age recommendation),
while certain other topics (including sexual education, drugs, violence)
are introduced in educational materials targeted at older kids. I know of
no educational system in the world that doesn't apply some sort of age
appropriate structure.
Dimi
Le jeu. 1 juin 2023 à 12:23, Henning Schlottmann <h.schlottmann(a)gmx.net> a
écrit :
Hi,
Am 01.06.2023 10:17 schrieb Dimi Dimitrov <dimi(a)wikimedia.be>be>:
Another general solution I personally like is to move age-verification to
the device or browser. [...] In this scenario the community would need to
provide metadata/categorisation for sensitive content. Not sure it is
feasible, but this is a universal approach that doesn't require the
hovering up of user data.
I don't want to consider this. Educational content is per se suitable for
all ages and should be exempt from any such demand. There is no age for
which educational content is "dangerous".
And Dimi, please do not support any such proposal towards law-makers,
because the communities will not follow you. I promise you, and everyone on
this list, that all mayor projects will not categorize content for
"appropriate age". I for one will prefer to shut down Wikipedia over
censoring access to our work.
Henning
_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list -- publicpolicy(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to publicpolicy-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
--
Dimitar Dimitrov
Policy Director
Wikimedia Europe
mobile: +32497720374
Rue Belliard 12 Belliardstraat, Brussels
https://wikimedia.brussels
--
Wikimedia Europe ivzw