Don't be discouraged by the controversies, public opinion and the majorities in
parliament are on your side. The pro FoP amendment just wasn't adopted in plenary
because it came too late in the day and couldn't be fine-tuned in negotiations.
I'm convinced that at least making the exception mandatory and a minimum standard for
what a FoP exception needs to cover would get a majority.
If I were you, I would be more worried about the idea to extend the scope of the
communication/making available right to include linking, just so press publishers can
charge Google for news aggregation. This could very well affect Wikipedia links to
newspaper articles as well (aside from the fact that it would break the Internet...)
Best,
Julia
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 05.11.2015 um 17:03 schrieb Karl Sigfrid
<karlsigfrid(a)gmail.com>om>:
That is interesting! I'm surprised that the Commission has the guts to float such
proposal after the controversies we saw at the EP vote.
Karl
On 11/5/2015 9:34 PM, Mathias Schindler wrote:
Hi,
a draft version of the communication is circulating:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/124I-_hlVFYQe7RV7ZEgWrW0czq-IWyax8vSy4bo…
You might find it interesting that the "panorama" exception (their
words) has been used to highlight issues with cross border exchange of
content. (Section 3)
Mathias
_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list
Publicpolicy(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list
Publicpolicy(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy