Hi James,
If the Foundation starts issuing an opinion about every issue, it risks diluting its brand
and lose credibility. And considering the community can’t even agree on Media Viewer, I
am also not sure how unanimous they would feel about universal health care or even world
peace.
Le 26 juil. 2015 à 22:11, James Salsman
<jsalsman(a)gmail.com> a écrit :
I am of the often non-unanimous opinions that the Foundation should, in complete yet
indirect accordance with its mission, take at least pro forma and ideally active stances
in favor of social issues such as free public education through college, universal
preventative health care, income equality, gender wage equity, and greenhouse gas
mitigation. Would anyone object to a discussion of these questions?
Also, a more specific legal advocacy question: If Harald Bischoff has defrauded Commons
reusers by requiring stricter attribution than the community requires, does the Foundation
have standing in Germany to require him to return the money to his victims in proportion
to the extent that their attribution was improper?
_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors