This we should definitely do. Let's list all the MEPs to whom we should extend our gratitude. (Not necessarily on this mailing list though.)
We will, as noted, find them among the Schaake's co-signatories. I will look through the plenary debate and see if I can identify additional people there that should get a thank you note.
MEPs who have indicated on Twitter or through the media that they have stood on our side (supporting the Schaake AM or the deletion alternative) should of course also be included.
Karl Back in Brussels after some time in Sweden
Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov wrote on 7/10/2015 12:39 PM:
Yes,
people like van de Camp, Ford and Boni from the EPP are exactly the ones we need to charm and ask them why their colleagues didn't follow them and get them to work with us on gathering support.
Dimi
2015-07-10 12:32 GMT+02:00 L.Gelauff <lgelauff@gmail.com mailto:lgelauff@gmail.com>:
At least Van de Camp is EPP member from NL? On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov <dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov@gmail.com <mailto:dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi all, Thanks to Nemo, who poked the EP services we have a full list of the MEPs who co-signed Marietje Schaake's amendment. I am attaching it. This is a good place to start cultivating allies for the actual Commission proposal. If you see some surprising name from your country, feel free to write a "thank you" message and offer to meet and help. Dimi 2015-07-10 11:26 GMT+02:00 Bence Damokos <bdamokos@gmail.com <mailto:bdamokos@gmail.com>>: The accepted version of the report is now online at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+TA+P8-TA-2015-0273+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN 2015-07-09 13:37 GMT+02:00 Szymon Grabarczuk <tar.locesilion@gmail.com <mailto:tar.locesilion@gmail.com>>: Could you attach the final, accepted version of the report? On 9 July 2015 at 13:26, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov <dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov@gmail.com <mailto:dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi all, The vote on FoP just passed. The negative text by Cavada was dropped by 502 to 40. The positive text by Schaake didn't pass by 228 to 303. The report as a whole was accepted with 445 to 65 with 32 abstentions. The question we need to discuss in Mexico is how we will tackle the Commission to propose something on FoP and what other points from the report we should focus on. Thanks everyone, we almost manage to achieve a full swing, which is a very tough feat to get done in 3 weeks. Cheers, Dimi _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors -- *Szymon Grabarczuk* Free Knowledge Advocacy Group EU Head of Research & Development Group, Wikimedia Polska pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tar_Lócesilion <http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tar_L%C3%B3cesilion> _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors