[Advocacy Advisors] Freedom of Panorama in Reda Report - Publicpolicy

Szymon Grabarczuk

9 Jul 9 Jul

11:37 a.m.

Could you attach the final, accepted version of the report? On 9 July 2015 at 13:26, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov < dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov(a)gmail.com> wrote:

...

Hi all, The vote on FoP just passed. The negative text by Cavada was dropped by 502 to 40. The positive text by Schaake didn't pass by 228 to 303. The report as a whole was accepted with 445 to 65 with 32 abstentions. The question we need to discuss in Mexico is how we will tackle the Commission to propose something on FoP and what other points from the report we should focus on. Thanks everyone, we almost manage to achieve a full swing, which is a very tough feat to get done in 3 weeks. Cheers, Dimi _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors

-- *Szymon Grabarczuk* Free Knowledge Advocacy Group EU Head of Research & Development Group, Wikimedia Polska pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tar_Lócesilion <http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tar_L%C3%B3cesilion>

Reply

Jan Apel

12:36 p.m.

Thanks a lot, Dimi! I know how much effort you put into this case. Of course we are not at the final final point. But I want to use the vote to send you a big thank you. See you in Mexico! Jan 2015-07-09 13:45 GMT+02:00 Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov < dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov(a)gmail.com>gt;:

...

It will take a while for the services to patch that together. But good news is that ancillary copyright also didn't pass. 2015-07-09 13:37 GMT+02:00 Szymon Grabarczuk <tar.locesilion(a)gmail.com>om>:

Could you attach the final, accepted version of the report? On 9 July 2015 at 13:26, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov < dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov(a)gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all, The vote on FoP just passed. The negative text by Cavada was dropped by 502 to 40. The positive text by Schaake didn't pass by 228 to 303. The report as a whole was accepted with 445 to 65 with 32 abstentions. The question we need to discuss in Mexico is how we will tackle the Commission to propose something on FoP and what other points from the report we should focus on. Thanks everyone, we almost manage to achieve a full swing, which is a very tough feat to get done in 3 weeks. Cheers, Dimi _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors

-- *Szymon Grabarczuk* Free Knowledge Advocacy Group EU Head of Research & Development Group, Wikimedia Polska pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tar_Lócesilion <http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tar_L%C3%B3cesilion> _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors

_______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors

-- Jan Apel Medien- & Öffentlichkeitsarbeit Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin Tel. (030) 219 158 26-0 http://wikimedia.de Stellen Sie sich eine Welt vor, in der jeder Mensch an der Menge allen Wissens frei teilhaben kann. Helfen Sie uns dabei! http://spenden.wikimedia.de/ Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.

Reply

Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov

10:17 a.m.

Hi all, Thanks to Nemo, who poked the EP services we have a full list of the MEPs who co-signed Marietje Schaake's amendment. I am attaching it. This is a good place to start cultivating allies for the actual Commission proposal. If you see some surprising name from your country, feel free to write a "thank you" message and offer to meet and help. Dimi 2015-07-10 11:26 GMT+02:00 Bence Damokos <bdamokos(a)gmail.com>om>:

...

The accepted version of the report is now online at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+TA+P8-T… 2015-07-09 13:37 GMT+02:00 Szymon Grabarczuk <tar.locesilion(a)gmail.com>om>:

Could you attach the final, accepted version of the report? On 9 July 2015 at 13:26, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov < dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov(a)gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all, The vote on FoP just passed. The negative text by Cavada was dropped by 502 to 40. The positive text by Schaake didn't pass by 228 to 303. The report as a whole was accepted with 445 to 65 with 32 abstentions. The question we need to discuss in Mexico is how we will tackle the Commission to propose something on FoP and what other points from the report we should focus on. Thanks everyone, we almost manage to achieve a full swing, which is a very tough feat to get done in 3 weeks. Cheers, Dimi _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors

-- *Szymon Grabarczuk* Free Knowledge Advocacy Group EU Head of Research & Development Group, Wikimedia Polska pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tar_Lócesilion <http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tar_L%C3%B3cesilion> _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors

_______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors

Reply

L.Gelauff

10:32 a.m.

At least Van de Camp is EPP member from NL? On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov < dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov(a)gmail.com> wrote:

...

Hi all, Thanks to Nemo, who poked the EP services we have a full list of the MEPs who co-signed Marietje Schaake's amendment. I am attaching it. This is a good place to start cultivating allies for the actual Commission proposal. If you see some surprising name from your country, feel free to write a "thank you" message and offer to meet and help. Dimi 2015-07-10 11:26 GMT+02:00 Bence Damokos <bdamokos(a)gmail.com>om>:

The accepted version of the report is now online at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+TA+P8-T… 2015-07-09 13:37 GMT+02:00 Szymon Grabarczuk <tar.locesilion(a)gmail.com>om>:

Could you attach the final, accepted version of the report? On 9 July 2015 at 13:26, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov < dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov(a)gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all, The vote on FoP just passed. The negative text by Cavada was dropped by 502 to 40. The positive text by Schaake didn't pass by 228 to 303. The report as a whole was accepted with 445 to 65 with 32 abstentions. The question we need to discuss in Mexico is how we will tackle the Commission to propose something on FoP and what other points from the report we should focus on. Thanks everyone, we almost manage to achieve a full swing, which is a very tough feat to get done in 3 weeks. Cheers, Dimi _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors

-- *Szymon Grabarczuk* Free Knowledge Advocacy Group EU Head of Research & Development Group, Wikimedia Polska pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tar_Lócesilion <http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tar_L%C3%B3cesilion> _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors

_______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors

Reply

Karl Sigfrid

5:01 p.m.

This we should definitely do. Let's list all the MEPs to whom we should extend our gratitude. (Not necessarily on this mailing list though.) We will, as noted, find them among the Schaake's co-signatories. I will look through the plenary debate and see if I can identify additional people there that should get a thank you note. MEPs who have indicated on Twitter or through the media that they have stood on our side (supporting the Schaake AM or the deletion alternative) should of course also be included. Karl Back in Brussels after some time in Sweden Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov wrote on 7/10/2015 12:39 PM:

...

Yes, people like van de Camp, Ford and Boni from the EPP are exactly the ones we need to charm and ask them why their colleagues didn't follow them and get them to work with us on gathering support. Dimi 2015-07-10 12:32 GMT+02:00 L.Gelauff <lgelauff(a)gmail.com <mailto:lgelauff@gmail.com>>: At least Van de Camp is EPP member from NL? On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov <dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov(a)gmail.com <mailto:dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi all, Thanks to Nemo, who poked the EP services we have a full list of the MEPs who co-signed Marietje Schaake's amendment. I am attaching it. This is a good place to start cultivating allies for the actual Commission proposal. If you see some surprising name from your country, feel free to write a "thank you" message and offer to meet and help. Dimi 2015-07-10 11:26 GMT+02:00 Bence Damokos <bdamokos(a)gmail.com <mailto:bdamokos@gmail.com>>: The accepted version of the report is now online at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+TA+P8-T… 2015-07-09 13:37 GMT+02:00 Szymon Grabarczuk <tar.locesilion(a)gmail.com <mailto:tar.locesilion@gmail.com>>: Could you attach the final, accepted version of the report? On 9 July 2015 at 13:26, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov <dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov(a)gmail.com <mailto:dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi all, The vote on FoP just passed. The negative text by Cavada was dropped by 502 to 40. The positive text by Schaake didn't pass by 228 to 303. The report as a whole was accepted with 445 to 65 with 32 abstentions. The question we need to discuss in Mexico is how we will tackle the Commission to propose something on FoP and what other points from the report we should focus on. Thanks everyone, we almost manage to achieve a full swing, which is a very tough feat to get done in 3 weeks. Cheers, Dimi _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors -- *Szymon Grabarczuk* Free Knowledge Advocacy Group EU Head of Research & Development Group, Wikimedia Polska pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tar_Lócesilion <http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tar_L%C3%B3cesilion> _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors

-- Karl Sigfrid +32 487 94 76 30 karl(a)wikimedia.be Rue du Trone 51 1000 Brussels

Reply

Tanel Pern

7:30 a.m.

Hi Dimi, Are the statistics on the votes on Schaake's amendment available somewhere? The votes for dropping Cavada's text are included in the session statistics but I can't find the votes on Schaake's text anywhere. Tanel 2015-07-09 14:26 GMT+03:00 Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov < dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov(a)gmail.com>gt;:

...

Hi all, The vote on FoP just passed. The negative text by Cavada was dropped by 502 to 40. The positive text by Schaake didn't pass by 228 to 303. The report as a whole was accepted with 445 to 65 with 32 abstentions. The question we need to discuss in Mexico is how we will tackle the Commission to propose something on FoP and what other points from the report we should focus on. Thanks everyone, we almost manage to achieve a full swing, which is a very tough feat to get done in 3 weeks. Cheers, Dimi _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors

Reply

Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov

9:12 a.m.

Hi all, Yes, adopting the Report was a roll-call vote (which means all the MEPs names and their voting behaviour are recorded). The Schaake amendment however wasn't. We only have the totals. The first next step for us has to be to gather as much information on who voted how so we can draw up a game plan for the next phase. We can either read peoples' statements or ask them directly. I can make an educated assumption that the EPP voted against and the S&D was at least split. ALDE, Greens and EFDD must have voted in favour. I'd have three first priorities that I'll try to figure out: 1. Did at least some EPPs vote for (e.g. the Polish delegation) 2. How did the S&D split occur (I assume IT & AT voted for, but what about UK & DE?) 3. Did the ECR vote indeed for or stick with the EPP line? Cheers, Dimi 2015-07-10 9:48 GMT+02:00 Bence Damokos <bdamokos(a)gmail.com>om>:

...

Hi, Voting list is online at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fNONSGML… (page 31, under §46 amendment 3 is the Shaake amendment): + 228, - 303, abstain: 24 The result of roll call votes are here, but the amendment was not a roll call vote, if I see correctly: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fNONSGML… Best regards, Bence 2015-07-10 9:30 GMT+02:00 Tanel Pern <tanel.pern(a)gmail.com>om>:

Hi Dimi, Are the statistics on the votes on Schaake's amendment available somewhere? The votes for dropping Cavada's text are included in the session statistics but I can't find the votes on Schaake's text anywhere. Tanel 2015-07-09 14:26 GMT+03:00 Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov < dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov(a)gmail.com>gt;:

Hi all, The vote on FoP just passed. The negative text by Cavada was dropped by 502 to 40. The positive text by Schaake didn't pass by 228 to 303. The report as a whole was accepted with 445 to 65 with 32 abstentions. The question we need to discuss in Mexico is how we will tackle the Commission to propose something on FoP and what other points from the report we should focus on. Thanks everyone, we almost manage to achieve a full swing, which is a very tough feat to get done in 3 weeks. Cheers, Dimi _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors

_______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors

Reply

L.Gelauff

12:45 p.m.

I think that's page 205 on http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fNONSGML… On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Laurentius <laurentius.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:

...

Il giorno ven, 10/07/2015 alle 11.12 +0200, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov ha scritto:

Yes, adopting the Report was a roll-call vote (which means all the MEPs names and their voting behaviour are recorded). The Schaake amendment however wasn't. We only have the totals. The first next step for us has to be to gather as much information on who voted how so we can draw up a game plan for the next phase. We can either read peoples' statements or ask them directly.

What about the vote to remove the Cavada text? Do we know who voted it? Lorenzo _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors

Reply