Hi Raul,
I'll try to provide a thorough analysis (to be honest I have only about a
quarter read the final text), but generally speaking there's nothing to get
really worried about. I expect we'll keep having mostly the same
problems/discussions, revolving around what is public and necessary
personal information.
Talking of data protection, the thing that worries me most is the fact that
we're publishing IP addresses of unregistered editors.
Cheers,
Dimi
2016-04-15 19:03 GMT+02:00 Raul Veede <raul.veede(a)gmail.com>om>:
Sorry, I have been up to my ears in FoP, so I
haven't been able to analyze
recently passed General Data Protection Regulation closely. Is there any
estimation on the final version, to which extent might it influence the
flow of request to Wikipedia about erasing personal data?
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/20160407IPR21776/Data-prote…
I mean, we are definitely in the business of gathering and sharing
people's personal data in biographical articles (incl. exporting it to
non-EU countries via Wikipedia), so - any new legal risks? Most comments
only mention companies but I'm sure it also concerns NCOs as collateral
damage (as usual).
I recall at least one case a couple of years ago when someone had
contacted Estonian Data Protection Agency which sent WMEE a rather
unofficial letter suggesting to comply. I pulled a half-Godwin on them
(stating and demonstrating they're incompetent, though not publicly;
probably should have, for educational value). Nothing followed. But I
suspect this directive would acquire the same influence on such cases as
full moon has in Arkham Asylum.
Raul
_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list
Publicpolicy(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy