Dear all:
I apologize for being late on this. I wanted to push this forward during the
past week but I couldn't find the time to do so. My idea, as we've already
discussed in our penultimate IRC meeting, is to transform the Frankfurt
meeting notes on the New Models working group into something a little bit
more readable, identifying those topics that are controversial or are TBD.
Given that this topic, as is the one on the flow of the money, is especially
sensitive for chapters, I think that regardless of the response we get now
we should openly discuss it during the Wikimedia Conference in Berlin. I put
the proposed text here so that you can make any comments or suggestions
before putting it on Meta as an official proposal for discussion from the MR
working group. "TBD" marks are supposed to be triggers for discussion --I'd
be glad if you find a clearer way to indicate so.
During our face-to-face meeting in Frankfurt, in late January, a working
group composed of Sj, Galileo and Morgan, with Jon as a facilitator,
envisaged a possible scheme for recognizing new types of groups, other than
Wikimedia chapters, existing as part of the Wikimedia movement. We found
that there are two main "types" that are already identifiable within the
existing groups that do not fill into the definition of Wikimedia chapters,
which are independent and incorporated organizations who promote and support
all of the Wikimedia projects within a specific state, and act as a proxy
between the Wikimedia movement and any other registered organizations within
that territory.
First, there are groups who may want to register and operate on a formal
basis, but whose interest is to promote not all of the Wikimedia projects
but a certain language, culture or subject matter. As languages and cultures
tend to go beyond boundaries, these groups can't be identified on a national
basis. They are subject-centered rather than spacially-centered (i.e. a
certain territory) and can operate on any possible place, on some countries
or even in a small area depending on their particular interests. These
groups can seek some sort of partnership with the Wikimedia Foundation
and/or existing Wikimedia chapters, and so we choose to call them ''partner
organizations'' for the moment. How to recognize them, how to arrange
trademark issues and how will they be funded are some of the main aspects to
be discussed.
On the other hand, there are groups formed by Wikimedians who, whether it is
for cultural, political or any other reasons, do not plan or do not want to
establish a formal, registered organization. They could still organize
outreach activities and community events, and even deal with private or
public organizations on an informal basis. If they grow organized and have
projects to develop on the ground, they may ask for funding or to be able to
use the Wikimedia trademarks to promote their events. How to identify them,
how to recognize them? We think that these groups can operate in a fairly
liberal model, with an almost automatic recognition scheme that could be
overturned if needed. We choose to call them ''Wikimedian associations'' for
now.
A third issue arises, that has to do with clearly establishing the
difference between the competences Wikimedia chapters have and with
identifying those in which these organizations would differ, as well as the
relation Wikimedia chapters would have with partner organizations and
Wikimedian associations --will we propose an horizontal model even for
territories where a Wikimedia chapter does already exist? Can we propose an
horizontal relationship between chapters and partner organizations when
these have a smaller area of interest and do not operate on the same basis?
If we indeed have an asymmetrical relationship, how will we define it? These
are all topics were Wikimedia chapters and other groups should to be heard,
as the MR working group has no authority to settle this issues but merely to
identify them a propose possible solutions.
To sum it up:
== Existing organizations ==
=== Wikimedia Foundation ===
* Interest scope: global
* Territorial range: ideally none (undefined), but operates per se in
territories where chapters don't yet exist
* Representation: global
* Registered (external): yes
* Recognized (internal): yes, by Wikimedia movement
* Trademarks: own
* Origin of funds: global fundraising, donations
* Capacity to sign agreements with third parties: yes
=== Wikimedia chapters ===
* Interest scope: global (promotion and support of all WM projects)
* Territorial range: country-specific (Note: if a national chapter does not
exist, subnational chapters might be established within subnational
entities)
* Representation: country exclusive, no one but the chapter stands for all
of WM projects)
* Registered (external): yes
* Recognized (internal): yes, by ChapCom
* Trademarks: agreement with WMF
* Origin of funds: fundraising agreements with WMF, WMF grants, member fees,
donations
* Capacity to sign agreements with third parties: yes
== Proposed new groups to be recognized ==
=== Partner organizations ===
* Interest scope: specific (promotion of WM projects in a determinate
language or of contents about a certain culture)
* Territorial range: undefined, variable, non exclusive
* Representation: non exclusive (if not none, i.e. can these groups act on
behalf of the Wikimedia movement? TBD)
* Registered (external): yes or optional (TBD)
* Recognized (internal): yes, by a renamed ChapCom or similar TBD body
* Trademarks: agreement possible if registered (TBD)
* Origin of funds: fundraising agreements with chapters if registered? (TBD,
but as they don't have a territorial basis they can't do global
fundraising)*, WMF grants? (TBD), chapter grants? (TBD), member fees,
donations
* Transparency and communication: commitment to movement ideals, full info
about organizers and supporters
* Capacity to sign agreements with third parties: yes, overseen by WMF on
global level or chapter on national level if they exist (TBD: is there any
reason why the chapter wouldn't sign such an agreement by itself? Think
about language-specific subsidies)
* Example: A Kurdish group could deal with everything Kurdish in a cultural
sense, but another group in that cultural community willing to be a section
of a Wikimedia chapter in the region would be fine too, if it cared mainly
about geography.
<nowiki>*</nowiki> A possible model would be for chapters in the region
where these partners operate to offer the possibility to donate a percentage
of the money to support these groups' activities --what would obviously need
fundraising agreements between chapters and partner organizations. For
instance, people donating to WM Irak from Irak could have the option to
state that they want a percentage of their donation to support the efforts
of a partner organization focused on promoting Kurdish language contents,
should such an organization and WM Irak exist.
=== Wikimedian associations ===
* Interest scope: variable, undetermined
* Territorial range: variable, mostly subnational, non exclusive
* Representation: non exclusive
* Registered (external): no
* Recognized (internal): yes, almost automatic, revocable
* Trademarks: case-by-case usage possible (TBD), permission by WMF or
chapters if they exist
* Origin of funds: case-by-case WMF grants possible or chapter grants if
they exist
* Transparency and communication: commitment to movement ideals, full info
about event organizers (for case-by-case grants and trademark usage)
* Example: A group formed by local Wikimedians in a city which does not yet
have a corresponding national Wikimedia chapter. They do not want to
incorporate but they plan to organize a GLAM outreach activity or a
conference and would need some money to do so (and being able to use the
Wikimedia trademarks would be good for PR and visibility).
* Capacity to sign agreements with third parties: can help with informal
negotiations, but WMF or chapter if they exist would sign agreements