I think we're entering in details here. We're talking spam (99.9%) that has
been sitting there for 3 months. Seems there are little objections to the
deletion of those messages, great. Some suggestions for how to record that
action - I guess it is up to the admins whether that is suitable and worth
the effort (I dont'see an upside, but if it is very easy, why not).
I do think 2 weeks would be much too short - lets stick to the term where
it's obvious (3 months), and we can re-evaluate later if it should be
shorter.
Best,
Lodewijk
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Gergo Tisza <gtisza(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:59 AM, James Heilman
<jmh649(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I simply ignore most of the spam that comes in. I
only get involved with
approving items that are not spam.
Ditto. Having old emails deleted (even with a much lower time limit such
as two weeks) would actually be very useful because then I wouldn't have to
fish through a huge list of spam mails on the management interface in the
rare case when an email is valid and I need to whitelist it.
_______________________________________________
Listadmins mailing list
Listadmins(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/listadmins