John,
It seems as if you have a very sensible approach. If you'd like to inquire about getting any of this unspecified OCLC data let me know. I can advocate internally for opening data for compatibility with Wikipedia projects.
Max Klein Wikipedia in Residence kleinm@oclc.org +17074787023
-----Original Message----- From: John Mark Ockerbloom [mailto:ockerblo@pobox.upenn.edu] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 4:43 PM To: Wikimedia & Libraries Subject: Re: [libraries] Linking from Wikipedia articles to local library resources
Thanks for your note. WorldCat Registry does look like a useful place to record the library-specific data I use in my application; in fact, I've been indexing libraries in my own databases using ISIL and OCLC identifiers partly with the thinking that this might make it easier to integrate with systems like the Registry down the road.
I'm already manually consulting WorldCat Registry for some information like identifiers, and things like probable ILS when it's not clear from the library website. There are some things I use that don't seem to be captured in the Registry at this point in quite the form I need for this application, and other things that I can't now get at (but that OCLC seems to have); but it seems possible to bridge the gap between our data schemes and share the data more readily.
I don't have time at the moment to go into more detail in this message, but I'd be happy to discuss this further when it's convenient.
Thanks,
John
On 3/5/13 1:31 PM, Klein,Max wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: John Mark Ockerbloom [mailto:ockerblo@pobox.upenn.edu] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 7:42 PM To: Wikimedia& Libraries Subject: Re: [libraries] Linking from Wikipedia articles to local library resources
On 3/4/13 9:35 PM, Asaf Bartov wrote:
Hi, John.
This is pretty nifty! Thanks for creating it.
I wonder: would it make sense to connect it to some of the open resolvers out there? (or are those only useful at the item level, whereas this produces searches?)
It depends on how the resolver is set up. Most OpenURL resolvers
are
primarily designed to link to known items, whereas this is trying to link to groups of items by or about someone or something. But the OpenURL 1.0 specification is pretty open-ended, and could encompass this sort of thing. I decided not to use it to implement this particular service, but if someone's library would provide better results via their OpenURL resolver than via their catalog or other discovery system, I could link to it.
(If anyone would like me to try linking to their library that way, you can let me know when you request service for the library at
http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/olbpcontact?type=library
Tell me about your wishes in the "Anything we should know ..."comment space, and leave your contact details in case I have any questions.)
Thanks,
JohnJohn,
What a fantastic idea! Conceptually this is the (ahem) missing link,
to realign GWR (Google> Wikipedia> References) to GWL (Google> Wikipedia> Libraries). That's the party line we've been delivering for a long time but without software or practice to materialize the promise.
With that in mind, I quite agree with Asaf that your notion of
Forward to Libraries could benefit from using preexisting linking technologies. With all necessary disclosure of my OCLC-partisanship I think that instead of registering libraries through this new UPenn database, it'd make more sense to use the already populated WorldCat Registry[1] . There thousands of libraries are already registered with ties into their Online Catalogs, OpenURL Resolvers, and Virtual References. Just look at the entry for UPenn [2].
This is a tremendous proposal which is theoretically complete. I'd
really like to help volunteer time and code to make it work as best as possible.
[1] http://www.worldcat.org/registry/Institutions [2] http://www.worldcat.org/registry/Institutions/2583
Max Klein Wikipedia in Residence kleinm@oclc.org +17074787023
Libraries mailing list Libraries@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries