On 21/03/13 22:06, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
On 03/21/2013 06:03 PM, Isarra Yos wrote:
This may seem completely random, but in that case would a separate extension to support this specifically perhaps work as a GSoC project?
I think an initial version could, with separate comments per revision. They might not have time to do things like maintain comments across revisions. E.g. if I comment on the second sentence, then they fix a typo in the first sentence, ideally my comment will be preserved. However, that's harder to implement.
Matt Flaschen
EE mailing list EE@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ee
Aye, but on the other hand without a more effective diff mechanism (and would it even be possible to get one that fully works without a strong AI?) could anything intended to work across revisions really work in practice?
Either way having the comments revision specific would still be useful - just have it mark the revisions with comments in the history and such, and people leave a note on the talkpage or wherever with a revision-specific link to see the comments. Could then work it into AFT as well as use it by itself for GA/FA review and equivalents.
Isn't AFTv5 revision-specific to an extent anyway?