On 26 Aug 2015 23:54, "James Heilman" <jmh649(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I simply ignore most of the spam that comes in. I only get involved with
approving
items that are not spam.
So do I do!
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Daniel
Zahn <dzahn(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:05 AM,
Patrick Rother <krd(a)gulu.net> wrote:
>> > Removing the symptoms is not the best approach. Orphaned lists should
>> > have new moderators appointed shortly or should be closed.
>
>> Agreed. Though i think it's not an
"either-or" kind of thing but we
>> should do both. The question is though how to define "orphaned" list.
>> We would need some criteria, then a script that detects them and
>> somehow notifies us, or even better just creates tickets.
>
>> --
>> Daniel Zahn <dzahn(a)wikimedia.org
>> Operations Engineer
>
>>
_______________________________________________
>> Listadmins mailing list
>> Listadmins(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/listadmins
> --
> James Heilman
> MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
> The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
>
www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
> As of July 2015 I am a board member of the
Wikimedia Foundation
> My emails; however, do not represent the official position of the WMF
>
_______________________________________________
> Listadmins mailing list
> Listadmins(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/listadmins