Hello,
I oppose as stated.
I would support the proposal with the modification that there is reporting
of deletions. The report should say which moderation queue is cleared, when
the emails were deleted, and how many emails were deleted.
Deletion is useful if we have a record of what is being deleted. Deletion
is not useful, and more likely harmful, if we get no feedback of what is
deleted. If a report of what is deleted is too much to ask then say
something more about why that is the case.
yours,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Daniel Zahn <dzahn(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Patrick Rother
<krd(a)gulu.net> wrote:
Removing the symptoms is not the best approach.
Orphaned lists should
have new moderators appointed shortly or should be closed.
Agreed. Though i think it's not an "either-or" kind of thing but we
should do both. The question is though how to define "orphaned" list.
We would need some criteria, then a script that detects them and
somehow notifies us, or even better just creates tickets.
--
Daniel Zahn <dzahn(a)wikimedia.org>
Operations Engineer
_______________________________________________
Listadmins mailing list
Listadmins(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/listadmins
--
Lane Rasberry
user:bluerasberry on Wikipedia
206.801.0814
lane(a)bluerasberry.com