If they're poaching our members seems to work, can't Wikiversity do same?
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Jeffrey Peters < 17peters@cardinalmail.cua.edu> wrote:
The original question was fine. The problem was that someone directed him elsewhere instead of trying to work with him on how to produce the content on Wikiversity. We've had a lot of problems with that in the past, and that is something everyone needs to look out for if we are going to have Wikiversity continue. It is a dying project because groups keep poaching our members.
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Nkansah Rexford <nkansahrexford@gmail.com
wrote:
@Jefrey, I'll simply advice you don't take this discussion personal. I hope we don't drag this discussion farther than it should be.
This thread has been dry for a period of time. Joe started a converstation I thought will keep things going, but its seems, according to Jefrey, he did that wrongly.
Find accepted. Let Wikiversity thread continue free from all policy violations then.
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Jeffrey Peters < 17peters@cardinalmail.cua.edu> wrote:
I'm Ottava Rima, which would be known by most Wikiversity regulars.
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Nkansah Rexford < nkansahrexford@gmail.com> wrote:
@Jefrey Who are you?
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Jeffrey Peters < 17peters@cardinalmail.cua.edu> wrote:
Mailing lists are not based on consensus, and the Foundation would never allow its sites to be used to direct people to non WMF sites and take away our volunteers.
Put up your account name if you do instead of merely claiming you have one.
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Joe Corneli holtzermann17@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Jeffrey Peters 17peters@cardinalmail.cua.edu wrote: > Really? By pointing out that directing people to other sites is wrong?
Yes, really, first because that policy is something you made up and it does not in any way represent a consensus view, and second because drowning the conversation with argument and comebacks is not the way to learn anything. (Only useful if Wikiversity is implementing a policy of trying to reproduce standard university politics... you know what they say about that, the arguments are so heated precisely because the stakes are so low.)
> Do you even have an account? Because too many people making claims about it > acceptable to direct others to other sites don't.
In fact, I do.
Wikiversity-l mailing list Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l
Wikiversity-l mailing list Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l
-- +Rexford https://plus.google.com/+Nkansahrexford | +CG Centralhttps://plus.google.com/b/103109918657638322478/103109918657638322478/posts | +233 266 811 165 l BFCThttp://www.blendernetwork.org/member/nkansah-rexford-nyarko/ | Wikimedian http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nkansahrexford
Wikiversity-l mailing list Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l
Wikiversity-l mailing list Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l
-- +Rexford https://plus.google.com/+Nkansahrexford | +CG Centralhttps://plus.google.com/b/103109918657638322478/103109918657638322478/posts | +233 266 811 165 l BFCThttp://www.blendernetwork.org/member/nkansah-rexford-nyarko/ | Wikimedian http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nkansahrexford
Wikiversity-l mailing list Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l
Wikiversity-l mailing list Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l