@jeffery, mentioning Planet math here is advertising? Really? When did that become advertising?
Hmmmm, still wondering. Its not as if the link is to Joe's personal website or something. Its a website known by many. Joe is just bringing up an issue and I believe its great considering the matter than banning the matter saying its advertising.
"Not an advertising group"? Apart from the mailing list of Wikiversity, where else can discussions of this sort be held?
I'm in this mailing list, Wikimania, Wikipedia, and other mailing lists. Links are posted to references and stuffs like that. They're all Wikimedia mailing list, but how come such links never get categorized as adverts but are used in discussion?
Is this "not advertising group" idea applied to only Wikiversity?
Cmon
google.com/+Nkansahrexford | sent from Tab On Dec 22, 2013 4:03 PM, "Joe Corneli" holtzermann17@gmail.com wrote:
I am bringing this to attention in the #wikimedia IRC channel.
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Jeffrey Peters 17peters@cardinalmail.cua.edu wrote:
Doesn't matter. This is a mailing list, not an advertisement group. Wikimedia mailing lists are not to be used for advertising.
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Joe Corneli holtzermann17@gmail.com wrote:
Jeffrey, are you the admin of this group? PlanetMath.org is well-established free/open project http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlanetMath which has contributed a lot of content to Wikipedia over the years
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Mathematics/PlanetMath_Ex... .
Mentioning the project is hardly advertising it.
Joe
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Jeffrey Peters 17peters@cardinalmail.cua.edu wrote:
Please don't advertise non-Wikimedia groups/links.
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Joe Corneli <
holtzermann17@gmail.com>
wrote:
As an alternative, this seems like something we would be interested
in
including in PlanetMath (planetmath.org).
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Robert Dodier robert.dodier@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am thinking of setting up one or more pages of math problems solved by Maxima, a symbolic computation system. I am imagining that there would be a main page and a page for each solved problem. Each problem page would have a brief discussion and then a solution with formulas, code, and graphics as needed. Is that something that is suitable for Wikiversity? It seems to be within the educational realm of Wikiversity, but I couldn't find anything to say whether it is definitely OK or not OK. It's not a problem if it's not OK.
Thanks for any light you can shed on this question.
Robert Dodier
Wikiversity-l mailing list Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l
Wikiversity-l mailing list Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l
Wikiversity-l mailing list Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l
Wikiversity-l mailing list Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l
Wikiversity-l mailing list Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l
Wikiversity-l mailing list Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l