Is it capable for serving a big load, by embedding it in infoboxes? Can we
start trying it in (relatively) small wikipedias?
Konstantinos Stampoulis
geraki(a)geraki.gr
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Οι παραπάνω απόψεις είναι προσωπικές και δεν εκφράζουν παρά μόνο εμένα. Το
μήνυμα θεωρείται εμπιστευτικό μόνο εάν το έχω ζητήσει ρητά, διαφορετικά
μπορείτε να το χρησιμοποιήσετε σε οποιαδήποτε δημόσια συζήτηση.
2016-01-07 22:37 GMT+02:00 Yuri Astrakhan <yastrakhan(a)wikimedia.org>rg>:
Hello,
Four months ago new maps were launched at
https://maps.wikimedia.org.
Russian, Italian, and other GeoHack language Wikipedias have switched to
it, as well as WikiVoyage community. I have been working closely with the
creators of the current mapping projects like WikiMiniAtlas and WIWOSM
(Daniel Schwen, Kolossos/Tim Alder, Magnus, Simon Legner, Sylvain, and
others) on trying to merge them together into one platform.
I believe our maps are now stable and capable enough to serve all users of
GeoHack, and can really use community's help to migrate it. Migration is
very simple - modify *Template:GeoTemplate* and *MediaWiki:GeoHack.js* as
was done here:
*
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:GeoTemplate
*
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:GeoHack.js
Eventually I am hoping that we won't need to use this complicated
approach, once Kartographer extension is finished.
EXAMPLE:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/geohack/geohack.php?language=ru&pagename=%D0%…
Please email if you have any questions. Thanks!
P.S. You might like my other project - interactive graphs, available on
all wiki. Feedback is welcome.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Graph/Demo
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-ambassadors mailing list
Wikitech-ambassadors(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-ambassadors