Is it capable for serving a big load, by embedding it in infoboxes? Can we start trying it in (relatively) small wikipedias?
Konstantinos Stampoulis geraki@geraki.gr http://www.geraki.gr ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Οι παραπάνω απόψεις είναι προσωπικές και δεν εκφράζουν παρά μόνο εμένα. Το μήνυμα θεωρείται εμπιστευτικό μόνο εάν το έχω ζητήσει ρητά, διαφορετικά μπορείτε να το χρησιμοποιήσετε σε οποιαδήποτε δημόσια συζήτηση.
2016-01-07 22:37 GMT+02:00 Yuri Astrakhan yastrakhan@wikimedia.org:
Hello,
Four months ago new maps were launched at https://maps.wikimedia.org. Russian, Italian, and other GeoHack language Wikipedias have switched to it, as well as WikiVoyage community. I have been working closely with the creators of the current mapping projects like WikiMiniAtlas and WIWOSM (Daniel Schwen, Kolossos/Tim Alder, Magnus, Simon Legner, Sylvain, and others) on trying to merge them together into one platform.
I believe our maps are now stable and capable enough to serve all users of GeoHack, and can really use community's help to migrate it. Migration is very simple - modify *Template:GeoTemplate* and *MediaWiki:GeoHack.js* as was done here:
- https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:GeoTemplate
- https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:GeoHack.js
Eventually I am hoping that we won't need to use this complicated approach, once Kartographer extension is finished.
EXAMPLE:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/geohack/geohack.php?language=ru&pagename=%D0%9...
Please email if you have any questions. Thanks!
P.S. You might like my other project - interactive graphs, available on all wiki. Feedback is welcome. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Graph/Demo
Wikitech-ambassadors mailing list Wikitech-ambassadors@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-ambassadors