Thanks for the information, but we have nothing to do with another person breaching their contract.
Brian Logan, Esq.
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 23:11:15 -0500 From: dgoodmanny@gmail.com To: wikimedia_nyc@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikimedia NYC] Museum of Art and Design lifts photo ban
that's between you and them. It does not affect Wikipedia. We're only concerned about copyright.
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Pharos pharosofalexandria@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Zev Sero zev@sero.name wrote:
On 24/12/2010 12:56 PM, Elias Friedman wrote:
The new policy is still too restrictive for commons:
"...we do insist that all images personally shot be used ONLY for personal reference. They cannot be published for commercial use."
They can say that, but why would anyone have to listen? On what authority do they purport to restrict what you do with the photos once you take them? If the objects you photograph are not themselves copyright, then the copyright on the photos belongs to you.
Well, there is the issue of property and contract law, and whether you're violating the "contract" that you got the admission and ticket under.
Thanks, Richard (User:Pharos)
-- Zev Sero The trouble with socialism is that you zev@sero.name eventually run out of other people’s money - Margaret Thatcher
Wikimedia_NYC mailing list Wikimedia_NYC@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia_nyc
Wikimedia_NYC mailing list Wikimedia_NYC@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia_nyc
-- David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
Wikimedia_NYC mailing list Wikimedia_NYC@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia_nyc