Hi everyone -- I tried to send this message last night, but it disappeared into the ether. That means that what was once time-sensitive is now in the urgent category. There's also a lightning talk about this this afternoon in the 5:15 hour at WikiConference North America.
***
Hello everyone,
Thanks to everyone who was able to attend our meeting yesterday. If you weren't able, we hope to see you next month at our November meeting.
Yesterday we discussed where things stand with the movement strategy process, and I didn't do a great job of explaining it. I just attended an info session with Xeno from the Wikimedia Foundation to learn more about this. The long and the short of it is this:
- Members of the global Wikimedia movement have been collectively crafting a movement strategy for years. (You can learn more about that here https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Recommendations if you're curious.) - The next big step is drafting the movement charter, a process that will be done by a committee. But first! The movement charter committee must be elected. - The affiliates from each region will put forward one selector, and those selectors will vote on the charter committee members. The regions are big -- our region is North America (which, for the purposes of this process is defined as the US and Canada). So all of the US and Canada will choose just one selector, and that selector will work with the selectors from all the other regions to vote on the members of the movement charter committee.
Did you get all that? It's a pretty elaborate process, and I've found it confusing until just now, meeting with Xeno. You can think of the selectors as the electoral college. We, the North Carolina Wikipedians, have to work with all the other affiliate groups across the US and Canada to choose *one* person to send to this electoral college. And the deadline is Monday. Oh, and nobody yet has self-nominated to be that selector!
So! Here's what I'd like to know:
- First, would anyone from our group like to nominate themselves to be a selector? I believe this would be a 5-10 hour commitment. The selector would read the bios of all 70 candidates https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Drafting_Committee/Candidates, and then vote for the 13 they think would do the best job according to the priorities of the North American affiliate groups. Because nobody has self-nominated, there's a good chance that anyone self-nominating would end up as the selector representing all of the US and Canada. (But no pressure. 😉 ) - Second, whoever the selector ends up being, it would be great to tell them what our values are as a user group. If anyone has the time and the inclination to look at this list of "compass statements" https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Drafting_Committee/Election_Compass_Statements and respond to this message with what they think is important, I'll gather that info and add it to this talk page https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Movement_Charter/Affiliates_by_Region/North_America on behalf of our group.
If you're inclined to do either of the above, please do so sometime this weekend -- the window closes soon!
And let me know if anyone has questions!
Emily
Good morning, all! I'm writing with an update on this process: There are now a few selectors nominated for our region (North America). You can see them here https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Affiliates_by_Region/North_America#Users_willing_to_be_a_selector under "users willing to be a selector." We (the NC user group) are being asked to endorse one nominee, which will inform the overall vote by the North American affiliate. The deadline is *today by 3pm*.
As a reminder, the selectors will represent affiliates in voting for members of the movement strategy drafting committee. (You can read more about that in my earlier message.)
For once, you're not hearing about this because I'm late in informing you. In this case, all of this is coming together very last-minute.
You (personally) have three options:
- If you don't have strong feelings, you can ignore this message. - If you support one of the nominees, please let me know *by 1pm today*. - If you support abstaining from this electoral-college-style process, please let me know *by 1pm today*.
You can send your opinion directly to me or respond to the whole list.
At 1pm I will endorse one of the selector candidates -- or abstain -- on behalf of the user group, based on what I've heard from y'all, along with my own opinion (which I'll treat as an equal vote to each of our user group members').
Let me know if you have questions. I know this is something of an opaque process.
Stay tuned: I believe individuals are also being asked to vote directly for nominees (not selectors -- those are just for affiliates), outside of this affiliate process. I will send you more details about that soon.
Yours, Emily
On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 1:49 PM E.S. Jack emilysjack@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone -- I tried to send this message last night, but it disappeared into the ether. That means that what was once time-sensitive is now in the urgent category. There's also a lightning talk about this this afternoon in the 5:15 hour at WikiConference North America.
Hello everyone,
Thanks to everyone who was able to attend our meeting yesterday. If you weren't able, we hope to see you next month at our November meeting.
Yesterday we discussed where things stand with the movement strategy process, and I didn't do a great job of explaining it. I just attended an info session with Xeno from the Wikimedia Foundation to learn more about this. The long and the short of it is this:
- Members of the global Wikimedia movement have been collectively
crafting a movement strategy for years. (You can learn more about that here https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Recommendations if you're curious.)
- The next big step is drafting the movement charter, a process that
will be done by a committee. But first! The movement charter committee must be elected.
- The affiliates from each region will put forward one selector, and
those selectors will vote on the charter committee members. The regions are big -- our region is North America (which, for the purposes of this process is defined as the US and Canada). So all of the US and Canada will choose just one selector, and that selector will work with the selectors from all the other regions to vote on the members of the movement charter committee.
Did you get all that? It's a pretty elaborate process, and I've found it confusing until just now, meeting with Xeno. You can think of the selectors as the electoral college. We, the North Carolina Wikipedians, have to work with all the other affiliate groups across the US and Canada to choose *one* person to send to this electoral college. And the deadline is Monday. Oh, and nobody yet has self-nominated to be that selector!
So! Here's what I'd like to know:
- First, would anyone from our group like to nominate themselves to be
a selector? I believe this would be a 5-10 hour commitment. The selector would read the bios of all 70 candidates https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Drafting_Committee/Candidates, and then vote for the 13 they think would do the best job according to the priorities of the North American affiliate groups. Because nobody has self-nominated, there's a good chance that anyone self-nominating would end up as the selector representing all of the US and Canada. (But no pressure. 😉 )
- Second, whoever the selector ends up being, it would be great to
tell them what our values are as a user group. If anyone has the time and the inclination to look at this list of "compass statements" https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Drafting_Committee/Election_Compass_Statements and respond to this message with what they think is important, I'll gather that info and add it to this talk page https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Movement_Charter/Affiliates_by_Region/North_America on behalf of our group.
If you're inclined to do either of the above, please do so sometime this weekend -- the window closes soon!
And let me know if anyone has questions!
Emily
A follow-up: I've endorsed LiAnnaDavis on behalf of our user group. As one other endorser writes, "LiAnna has been following the movement charter/consultation/election process closely and I am glad that she wants to continue in this role!"
Emily
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 8:56 AM E.S. Jack emilysjack@gmail.com wrote:
Good morning, all! I'm writing with an update on this process: There are now a few selectors nominated for our region (North America). You can see them here https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Affiliates_by_Region/North_America#Users_willing_to_be_a_selector under "users willing to be a selector." We (the NC user group) are being asked to endorse one nominee, which will inform the overall vote by the North American affiliate. The deadline is *today by 3pm*.
As a reminder, the selectors will represent affiliates in voting for members of the movement strategy drafting committee. (You can read more about that in my earlier message.)
For once, you're not hearing about this because I'm late in informing you. In this case, all of this is coming together very last-minute.
You (personally) have three options:
- If you don't have strong feelings, you can ignore this message.
- If you support one of the nominees, please let me know *by 1pm today*
.
- If you support abstaining from this electoral-college-style process,
please let me know *by 1pm today*.
You can send your opinion directly to me or respond to the whole list.
At 1pm I will endorse one of the selector candidates -- or abstain -- on behalf of the user group, based on what I've heard from y'all, along with my own opinion (which I'll treat as an equal vote to each of our user group members').
Let me know if you have questions. I know this is something of an opaque process.
Stay tuned: I believe individuals are also being asked to vote directly for nominees (not selectors -- those are just for affiliates), outside of this affiliate process. I will send you more details about that soon.
Yours, Emily
On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 1:49 PM E.S. Jack emilysjack@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone -- I tried to send this message last night, but it disappeared into the ether. That means that what was once time-sensitive is now in the urgent category. There's also a lightning talk about this this afternoon in the 5:15 hour at WikiConference North America.
Hello everyone,
Thanks to everyone who was able to attend our meeting yesterday. If you weren't able, we hope to see you next month at our November meeting.
Yesterday we discussed where things stand with the movement strategy process, and I didn't do a great job of explaining it. I just attended an info session with Xeno from the Wikimedia Foundation to learn more about this. The long and the short of it is this:
- Members of the global Wikimedia movement have been collectively
crafting a movement strategy for years. (You can learn more about that here https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Recommendations if you're curious.)
- The next big step is drafting the movement charter, a process that
will be done by a committee. But first! The movement charter committee must be elected.
- The affiliates from each region will put forward one selector, and
those selectors will vote on the charter committee members. The regions are big -- our region is North America (which, for the purposes of this process is defined as the US and Canada). So all of the US and Canada will choose just one selector, and that selector will work with the selectors from all the other regions to vote on the members of the movement charter committee.
Did you get all that? It's a pretty elaborate process, and I've found it confusing until just now, meeting with Xeno. You can think of the selectors as the electoral college. We, the North Carolina Wikipedians, have to work with all the other affiliate groups across the US and Canada to choose *one* person to send to this electoral college. And the deadline is Monday. Oh, and nobody yet has self-nominated to be that selector!
So! Here's what I'd like to know:
- First, would anyone from our group like to nominate themselves to
be a selector? I believe this would be a 5-10 hour commitment. The selector would read the bios of all 70 candidates https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Drafting_Committee/Candidates, and then vote for the 13 they think would do the best job according to the priorities of the North American affiliate groups. Because nobody has self-nominated, there's a good chance that anyone self-nominating would end up as the selector representing all of the US and Canada. (But no pressure. 😉 )
- Second, whoever the selector ends up being, it would be great to
tell them what our values are as a user group. If anyone has the time and the inclination to look at this list of "compass statements" https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Drafting_Committee/Election_Compass_Statements and respond to this message with what they think is important, I'll gather that info and add it to this talk page https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Movement_Charter/Affiliates_by_Region/North_America on behalf of our group.
If you're inclined to do either of the above, please do so sometime this weekend -- the window closes soon!
And let me know if anyone has questions!
Emily
wikimedia-us-nc@lists.wikimedia.org