Apparently the affiliate-selected board seat change is this: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliate-selected_Board_seats/ Resolution_2019 So actual thing: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliate-selected_Board_seats/2019 It looks like they somehow mistook me for the point of contact for the user group (possibly because we don't have one? is that even possible? or am I, in which case, is that wise?) and that's why I got the emails. Anyway, here's the sum of what seems to be the case:    • We, as a user group, get a vote on the two affiliate-selected board seats! Probably. All the user groups in good standing now      get a vote, along with all other affiliates. (Unless you have two really redundant groups or something, but that doesn't really      apply to us.)    • We may or may not need to actually specify a membership list to do this. Technically the list on meta seems to count, though,      even if it's not necessarily accurate.    • We do need to get our annual report in (and we will! Yay! We're on top of things!)    • To vote, we will designate a delegate to actually cast the vote. How they vote is up to us as a pile, or them, or whatever we      all decide in general. Maybe we sign up a bobcat someone trapped in their kitchen and it does... something totally random?      Probably not, but that'd be a proper local, at any rate.    • Voting works by ranking candidates. More information will happen on this once candidates nominate themselves.    • Any of you can nominate yourselves as a candidate, unless you're a bobcat or something. For the WMF board. Yes. But you      probably can't be our delegate if you do?    • Okay, so we probably can't nominate a bobcat as our delegate either.    • Also they need more facilitators for the actual vote, if anyone's interested, but the deadline is apparently today. If any of this is totally unclear (or possibly downright incoherent), I sincerely apologise, but I'm not dealing with the bobcat. -I On 29/03/2019 08:56, Isarra Yos wrote:      Hi, all.      So I made it to the summit, and so far I have this to report: help I want to go back to bed. Also uuuuh we're apparently an      affiliate and have some say in affiliate-selected board seats?!      But seriously, the focus of this thing seems a lot more specific than previous years, not that I'm particularly familiar with      previous years either: it's all about Strategy. Movement process. 2030 stuff. That... discussion I maybe kind of sort of      derailed a year or two ago on this same list (sorry about that). As such, I'm wondering if anyone does have any particular      thoughts on this, or ideas as to stuff I ought to be looking into in particular that might affect us as a group/loosely      affiliated lump of people in theoretical proximity to each other who occasionally organise things in theoretically relevant      geological locations?      Or if you actually want to read up it, it's probably this: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20      As for the affiliate-selected board seats thing, I'm... honestly not really sure what the deal with that is - I've been signed      up for a mailing list about it (possibly as the selected person for this conference? Not sure - was anyone else added to that?)      but haven't been able to find out a whole lot about what's the deal with that onwiki, either, partly on account of being a bit      distracted travelling all over and being ill.      So, yeah, should I be representing us on that, too, does anyone know any more about that one, and what do we make of that?!      -I _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-US-CO mailing list Wikimedia-US-CO(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-us-co