It looks like they somehow mistook me
for the point of contact for the user group (possibly because we
don't have one? is that even possible? or am I, in which case, is
that wise?) and that's why I got the emails. Anyway, here's the
sum of what seems to be the case:
- We, as a user group, get a vote on the two
affiliate-selected board seats! Probably. All the user groups
in good standing now get a vote, along with all other
affiliates. (Unless you have two really redundant groups or
something, but that doesn't really apply to us.)
- We may or may not need to actually specify a membership list
to do this. Technically the list on meta seems to count,
though, even if it's not necessarily accurate.
- We do need to get our annual report in (and we will! Yay!
We're on top of things!)
- To vote, we will designate a delegate to actually cast the
vote. How they vote is up to us as a pile, or them, or
whatever we all decide in general. Maybe we sign up a bobcat
someone trapped in their kitchen and it does... something
totally random? Probably not, but that'd be a proper local, at
any rate.
- Voting works by ranking candidates. More information will
happen on this once candidates nominate themselves.
- Any of you can nominate yourselves as a candidate, unless
you're a bobcat or something. For the WMF board. Yes. But you
probably can't be our delegate if you do?
- Okay, so we probably can't nominate a bobcat as our delegate
either.
- Also they need more facilitators for the actual vote, if
anyone's interested, but the deadline is apparently today.
If any of this is totally unclear (or
possibly downright incoherent), I sincerely apologise, but I'm not
dealing with the bobcat.
-I
On 29/03/2019 08:56, Isarra Yos wrote:
Hi, all.
So I made it to the summit, and so far I have this to report: help
I want to go back to bed. Also uuuuh we're apparently an affiliate
and have some say in affiliate-selected board seats?!
But seriously, the focus of this thing seems a lot more specific
than previous years, not that I'm particularly familiar with
previous years either: it's all about Strategy. Movement process.
2030 stuff. That... discussion I maybe kind of sort of derailed a
year or two ago on this same list (sorry about that). As such, I'm
wondering if anyone does have any particular thoughts on this, or
ideas as to stuff I ought to be looking into in particular that
might affect us as a group/loosely affiliated lump of people in
theoretical proximity to each other who occasionally organise
things in theoretically relevant geological locations?
Or if you actually want to read up it, it's probably this:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20
As for the affiliate-selected board seats thing, I'm... honestly
not really sure what the deal with that is - I've been signed up
for a mailing list about it (possibly as the selected person for
this conference? Not sure - was anyone else added to that?) but
haven't been able to find out a whole lot about what's the deal
with that onwiki, either, partly on account of being a bit
distracted travelling all over and being ill.
So, yeah, should I be representing us on that, too, does anyone
know any more about that one, and what do we make of that?!
-I