Sincerely, Nicholas Michael Bashour
Washington’s Wikipedia profile gets cleaned up during ‘Edit-a-Thon’ http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/history-buffs-buff-up-washingtons-wikipe...
For a man who once had a pretty big presence in Washington, Crosby Stuart Noyessure had a pretty anemic presence on Wikipedia. At least, he did on Saturday morning, when the 19th-century publisher of the Evening Star newspaper’s listing on the crowdsourced, online encyclopedia was a mere two sentences long.
But by Saturday afternoon, Noyes had been supersized, or at least given a Wikipedia treatment a little more in keeping with his importance: seven paragraphs and five footnotes.
This was all thanks to Andrew Kuchling, who was one of about two dozen local history buffs who spent Saturday at the Historical Society of Washington engaged in a Wikipedia “Edit-a-Thon.” Their mission: Create, improve, correct and footnote Wikipedia entries related to our fair city.
Sure, these Wikipedians could work solo, in the privacy of their homes, but there’s something more communal about doing it together.
Of course, the Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon was a lot more sedate than other activities ending in “thon”: marathon, telethon, Toyotathon. . . . Picture studious people bent over their laptops at the polished wood tables of the society’s Kiplinger Research Library. Some had pulled reference materials from the library’s collection, others were looking for material online. Librarians and Wiki experts were available to help.
The first issue was what to tackle. The library had provided a list of possible starting points, a few people, places and things that many D.C. residents no doubt know about but that were absent on Wikipedia or inexpertly presented: Petworth, quadrants, Chuck Brown, Howard Theatre, School Without Walls, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Sycamore Island, Snows Court. . . .
Crosby Stuart Noyes wasn’t on the list, but Andrew, who lives in Bowie and works as a software developer for a cable company, thought the guy could use some help.
“I think running the Evening Star all those years is fairly significant,” Andrew said. He’d fleshed out Noyes’s life using a 1932 book on notable D.C. figures from the society’s collection and added links to a newspaper article the journalist had written in his 20s.
After fixing the spelling of the middle name of one of Noyes’s son — it wasWilliams, not William — Andrew decided to beef up the two sons’ entries.
“It’s a way of exercising my writing skills, but I don’t need to work on it for days and days,” Andrew said. “Four hours is plenty.”
Rita Moore and Nicole Beyer sat across from one another one table over. Rita, an insurance agent by day, had the vertical file from the Petworth Citizens Association to one side and was contemplating tweaking the Petworthentry to indicate that the borders of that neighborhood have been somewhat flexible.
Nicole, a senior at George Washington University, was fleshing out the entry forConcordia German Evangelical Church and Rectory in Foggy Bottom, adding information on the value of the church’s property and how big the congregation was.
“I’m a big fan of Census data,” she said.
Adam Lewis, the historical society’s director of development and the person who in 2008 rescued Wikipedia’s main Washington, D.C., entry from mediocrity, described the perfect entry: verifiable, with proper citations and a neutral tone. And it can’t contain original research.
Said Adam, “You’d be surprised how many people say, ‘Well I live down the block, and I know X.’ ”
Just living down the block and knowing X doesn’t cut it on Wikipedia, which is why so many articles are flagged as needing work.
But what a vast and potentially dispiriting endeavor. At last count, there were 4,193,775 English-language entries on Wikipedia. All anyone can hope to do is nibble away at the errors contained therein and add tiny drops of information to the vast sea of knowledge.
“I think every little bit helps,” saidChloe Raub, a Catholic University library sciences student who was working on the listing for William R. Perl, an Austrian-born lawyer and head of the Jewish Defense League’s Washington office. “I think that what Wikipedia depends on is a whole lot of people taking a little time to make it better.”
At his computer, Adam scrolled through some other D.C.-related entries, clicking on Pierre Charles L’Enfant. The entry looked pretty good. Then Adam noticed something. “His entire early life is not cited,” he said disapprovingly.
Get cracking, Washington Wikipedians!
For previous columns, visitwashingtonpost.com/johnkelly.
That's great! I plugged wikipedia editing for oldsters in the comments section.
I really regretted missing the edit-a-thon...
Of course, I'm sure I'd have shot my big mouth off and he'd have thrown in there some crack about Carol's libertarian POV that WashPost doesn't like too much. I'm one of those big mouths they always end up quoting in various articles. (Though thankfully my Wiki article with several such quotes got deleted anyway.) Well, I see they found one controversial individual to report on, even if he is dead...
The universe continues to protect wikipedia :-)
I just hope Foundation Exec Director Sue Gardner and her trusty keyboard/key pad will be able to keep on doing it in her next internet venture - vs. the censors! Per the below for anyone who might have missed it.
CM
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Announcement *please read* Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:04:49 -0700 From: Sue Gardner sgardner@wikimedia.org Reply-To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Hello Wikimedia community members,
This is not an easy e-mail to write, and it's been a very hard decision to make. But I'm writing to tell you that I'm planning to leave my position as the Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation.
My departure isn't imminent -- the Board and I anticipate it'll take at least six months to recruit my successor, and I'll be fully engaged as Executive Director all through the recruitment process and until we have a new person in place. We're expecting that'll take about six months or so, and so this note is not goodbye -- not yet.
Making the decision to leave hasn't been easy, but it comes down to two things.
First, the movement and the Wikimedia Foundation are in a strong place now. When I joined, the Foundation was tiny and not yet able to reliably support the projects. Today it's healthy, thriving, and a competent partner to the global network of Wikimedia volunteers. If that wasn't the case, I wouldn't feel okay to leave. In that sense, my leaving is a vote of confidence in our Board and executive team and staff --- I know they will ably steer the Foundation through the years ahead, and I'm confident the Board will appoint a strong successor to me.
And I feel that although we're in good shape, with a promising future, the same isn't true for the internet itself. (This is thing number two.) Increasingly, I'm finding myself uncomfortable about how the internet's developing, who's influencing its development, and who is not. Last year we at Wikimedia raised an alarm about SOPA/PIPA, and now CISPA is back. Wikipedia has experienced censorship at the hands of industry groups and governments, and we're --increasingly, I think-- seeing important decisions made by unaccountable non-transparent corporate players, a shift from the open web to mobile walled gardens, and a shift from the production-based internet to one that's consumption-based. There are many organizations and individuals advocating for the public interest online -- what's good for ordinary people -- but other interests are more numerous and powerful than they are. I want that to change. And that's what I want to do next.
I've always aimed to make the biggest contribution I can to the general public good. Today, this is pulling me towards a new and different role, one very much aligned with Wikimedia values and informed by my experiences here, and with the purpose of amplifying the voices of people advocating for the free and open internet. I don't know exactly what this will look like -- I might write a book, or start a non-profit, or work in partnership with something that already exists. Either way, I feel strongly that this is what I need to do.
I feel an increasing sense of urgency around this. That said, I also feel a strong sense of responsibility (and love!) for the Wikimedia movement, and so I've agreed with the Board that I'll stay on as Executive Director until we have my successor in place. That'll take some time -- likely, at least six months.
Until then, nothing changes. The Wikimedia Foundation has lots of work to do, and you can expect me to focus fully on it until we have a new Executive Director in place.
I have many people to thank, but I'm not going to do it now -- there'll be time for that later. For now, I'll just say I love working with you all, I'm proud of everything the Wikimedia movement is accomplishing, and I'm looking forward to our next six months together.
Jan-Bart's going to write a note in a couple of minutes with information about the transition process. We'll be hosting office hours this weekend as well, so anybody with questions can ask them here or turn up to talk with us on IRC.
Thanks, Sue
wikimedia-dc@lists.wikimedia.org