On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Casey Brown lists@caseybrown.org wrote:
2011/5/26 N Michael Bashour nicholasbashour@gmail.com:
Attached are two PNG versions of the proposed logo. They're not meant to be separate logos, just two versions of the same one, where the use of either would depend on the context. One version has the text of the name, designed for situations where the text would be large enough to read (i.e. banners, posters, large promotional materials, etc.). The non-text version is for use in social media, postcards, notepads etc., where the text otherwise would be too small to read. Let me know if you have any questions, comments or suggetions
As far as I know, all Wikimedia chapters use the same basic logo. (Basically, the Wikimedia Foundation logo http://wikimediafoundation.org with "PLACE" instead of "FOUNDATION".)
I don't know if you guys really want to be spending energy coming up with a new logo if you won't actually be able to use it as a formal chapter. If you guys were just planning on using this until you were an official chapter, then never mind. :-)
That's the primary intent, since it's unclear when we might be recognized as a chapter.
(There could be, I suppose, circumstances in which a chapter might need to use a non-Wikimedia logo -- it really depends on how the phrase "related activities" in the chapter agreement is interpreted -- but that's a theoretical subtlety that may be of limited practical applicability.)
Kirill