On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Casey Brown <lists@caseybrown.org> wrote:

2011/5/26 N Michael Bashour <nicholasbashour@gmail.com>:

> Attached are two PNG versions of the proposed logo. They're not meant
> to be separate logos, just two versions of the same one, where the use
> of either would depend on the context. One version has the text of the
> name, designed for situations where the text would be large enough to
> read (i.e. banners, posters, large promotional materials, etc.). The
> non-text version is for use in social media, postcards, notepads etc.,
> where the text otherwise would be too small to read. Let me know if
> you have any questions, comments or suggetions

As far as I know, all Wikimedia chapters use the same basic logo.
(Basically, the Wikimedia Foundation logo
<http://wikimediafoundation.org> with "PLACE" instead of
"FOUNDATION".)

I don't know if you guys really want to be spending energy coming up
with a new logo if you won't actually be able to use it as a formal
chapter. If you guys were just planning on using this until you were
an official chapter, then never mind. :-)

That's the primary intent, since it's unclear when we might be recognized as a chapter.

(There could be, I suppose, circumstances in which a chapter might need to use a non-Wikimedia logo -- it really depends on how the phrase "related activities" in the chapter agreement is interpreted -- but that's a theoretical subtlety that may be of limited practical applicability.)

Kirill